Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-12-2014, 03:22 PM
 
924 posts, read 666,941 times
Reputation: 312

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
nope..it was a plane..been proven many times
What is your definition of proven?

Do you have irrefutable evidence to submit? Perhaps a video or picture showing a plane hitting the pentagon?

 
Old 02-12-2014, 03:24 PM
 
924 posts, read 666,941 times
Reputation: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperthetic View Post
What a sadist, anyone who would pull the wings off an airplane.
Lol.

Haven't you heard, bro?

The paper thin fuselage slammed through 3 rings of the strongest, recently reinforced, building on earth, but the wings loaded with jet fuel, the tail, the stabilizers, and the Rolls Royce engines made out of steel and titanium simply vaporized before impact.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 03:28 PM
Status: "It Can't Rain All The Time" (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,588,006 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
It used to be one word? When? I learned how to spell it the correct way (a lot), probably around the 3rd grade, in the late-1960s.

BTW, the correct phrase is "it used to be one word..."
I don't know when it changed. I know the change was pointed out in college Business English 1991. Either or is acceptable grammar, however in a legal documents it is preferred to be "used" in a sentence by spelling it as two words.

And you care why?
 
Old 02-12-2014, 03:29 PM
 
13,302 posts, read 7,864,463 times
Reputation: 2142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet View Post
Lol.

Haven't you heard, bro?

The paper thin fuselage slammed through 3 rings of the strongest, recently reinforced, building on earth, but the wings loaded with jet fuel, the tail, the stabilizers, and the Rolls Royce engines made out of steel and titanium simply vaporized before impact.
To atheists, it was the hand of God what plucked da wings.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 03:30 PM
 
924 posts, read 666,941 times
Reputation: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperthetic View Post
To atheists, it was the hand of God what plucked da wings.
So that's how the angels get them...
 
Old 02-12-2014, 03:47 PM
 
924 posts, read 666,941 times
Reputation: 312
So I thought there was a handful of people that were queuing up to flagellate me with truth?
 
Old 02-12-2014, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,850 posts, read 24,091,732 times
Reputation: 15114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet View Post
Sorry, I thought you were ignoring me.
I'm always in the mood for high quality entertainment. I do live in Las Vegas, after all.

So what gives? Aren't you going to share your version of "the truth" with us?
 
Old 02-12-2014, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by actonbell View Post
I don't know when it changed. I know the change was pointed out in college Business English 1991. Either or is acceptable grammar, however in a legal documents it is preferred to be "used" in a sentence by spelling it as two words.

And you care why?
My 2004 American Heritage college dictionary does not have the word "alot" in it (because that is not correct grammar). It does have the word "allot," which means to parcel out, distribute or apportion; to assign as a portion.

I care because when a serious topic, such as the 9/11 attacks are being discussed, proper English really should be used, especially with simple words.

Spelling « GrammarErrors.com: Common English language errors
 
Old 02-12-2014, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet View Post
Lol.

Haven't you heard, bro?

The paper thin fuselage slammed through 3 rings of the strongest, recently reinforced, building on earth, but the wings loaded with jet fuel, the tail, the stabilizers, and the Rolls Royce engines made out of steel and titanium simply vaporized before impact.
In a past thread about this same topic, photos of one of the engines was posted. The engines did not "vaporize before impact."
 
Old 02-12-2014, 04:23 PM
 
924 posts, read 666,941 times
Reputation: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
In a past thread about this same topic, photos of one of the engines was posted. The engines did not "vaporize before impact."
Then explain why there were no impact holes for either engine, the wings, the rear stabilizers, or the tail.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top