Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As I thought, you cannot back up the statements you use to "disprove" the clear causes of the WTC collapse.
That's always the case with these silly conspiracy theorists.
Physics disproves the official story, as has been noted time and time again.
There's a myriad of websites and articles and video I could link to, about 5 seconds before they all get labelled as uncredible garbage.
Where's your evidence? Notations?
Do you realize I'm not claiming how 9/11 happened, I'm claiming that the official story is NOT how it happened. Surely even your tenuous grasp on logic allows you to know that you don't have to prove a negative.
I'm telling you the towers didn't collapse from jet fuel, now if you want to tell me they did , you have to prove it.
The additional weight of the planes was reduced to minus numbers upon the vaporization of the fuel and furniture in the buildings.
This caused a net weight REDUCTION applying to the floors below the impact level.
The buildings were actually enlightened by the planes.
This contributed in a small way to global warming.
Lol at global warming, but you make a decent point. Any weight gained by the jet and it's fuel would have been offset by the fires burning up things near the impact zone.
Either way, the redundancy levels of the support structure would have held up 5 crashed planes, if that was the only damage.
There's been claims of military aircraft speeds and stunt plane speeds, all still far from 500 mph.
Not a single person has proven that an unmodified Boeing 757 commercial jet can fly at 500 mph at 2,000 ft. Try paying attention and not letting your agenda blur reality.
Your continued regurgitation of the falsehood you posted above, despite it's obvious inaccuracy and the fact that it's been pointed out to you several times, is nothing short of blatant and intentional lying. Since you knowingly repeat things that you know to be false, there's no reason that anyone should believe anything else you write, either.
How about this - PROVE YOUR CLAIM. I've demonstrated that the opposite is true, using the manufacturer's specifications and a handy calculator written by NASA. I'm pretty sure that those two sources are accurate and unbiased, so the onus is now on you to prove your claim, since the facts disagree with it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
