Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The official story is a silly theory so you do need some proof if you'd like to back it up as fact.
Usually the people who think it is silly, are interpreting it in silly (and false) ways, such as "It says the steel melted" or "The planes couldn't have flown that fast".
They have to prove such allegations if they want to be taken seriously themselves.
A jetline CAN travel @ VMO @ sea level...the question is for how long?
If the specifications set max op @ IAS of 360 knots because TAS increases during ascent...then obviously there is aerodynamic stress at a certain speed... I cannot find any info indicating that this is ONLY @ mach 1
And the question still remains...can a rogue TERRORIST control a plane operating 160 kts greater than it's specified TAS? (Reported impact speed was 590 mph at the South Tower) I don't care if this dude lived in a simulation with a catheter and an IV feed...the bottom line is this guy was highly inexperienced.
I highly doubt that.
So what's your theory? There are so many, a person can't assume that a truther subscribes to any specific one, so what's yours? Death rays from space? Remote control of empty planes? Which is your specific flavor of crazy?
So what's your theory? There are so many, a person can't assume that a truther subscribes to any specific one, so what's yours? Death rays from space? Remote control of empty planes? Which is your specific flavor of crazy?
No, actually....mine is pretty rational.
A False flag.
Whether orchestrated inside or just conveniently being "lax"... your pick.
Usually the people who think it is silly, are interpreting it in silly (and false) ways, such as "It says the steel melted" or "The planes couldn't have flown that fast".
They have to prove such allegations if they want to be taken seriously themselves.
They have uniformily failed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chin_Muzik_NJ
No, actually....mine is pretty rational.
A False flag.
Whether orchestrated inside or just conveniently being "lax"... your pick.
lol - there is no way in the world that plane hit the South Tower @ 590 mph with a pilot manually behind that rudder.
And we are in the process of explaining that now. And none of the arguments being laid out have been debunked. So, no... I don't know if anybody "sees" what you see.
You seem to have trouble seeing.
How about you "prove" the official explanation??? CAN YOU DO THAT!??
No one can prove the official theory anymore than any other.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
