Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If it's a policy that benefits the rich, then it doesn't have to be paid for, should last forever and is good for America," Stewart summed up.
"But if it benefits the poor, we can't afford it, should end it as soon as possible and it will destroy our nation from within. Because if you give money to people who don't have it, it corrupts them. But if you give it to people who are already rich, they have a money immunity built up already. Handouts don't hurt them. Money is the root of all evil for people who don't have any already -- just like smallpox is for the Native American community," he said.
That about sums it up right there
Without the policies of rich vs poor I wonder what the left would complain about.
The same power the government has to give money is the same power they want to decide who it take it away from.
The question they NEVER want to admit is WHY does the government and or why should they have the right to take anyone's money? The policies of theft and the power of government should be what the leftist like Stewart should be asking and how and or why they think this is liberty. He is a socialist and because he is a proud and free speaking socialist their agenda always asks for power to control it all.
I suspect he doesn't mind the millions of dollars the rich Hollywood celebrities have or the over $3billions the extremely rich and liberal Oprah owns, ir the fact that the very corrupt and greedy Clintons have amassed huge wealth.
How is this relevant? Cant rich people recognize the issues of poverty? And since when does the GOP attack people because they are wealthy?
Actual, Stewart is a writer first and foremost, so take your butthurt elsewhere.
Lol @ your childish use of "butthurt". I have kids that use that same term, but they are teenagers.
Even AS a writer, Stewart writes less than 25%. He's certainly not the lead writer, and they have a staff of writers that all contribute.
And it's not like he's writing financial analysis pieces. Most of his material -- as with any "talk show" -- is nothing to brag about. He's honestly about as funny as Letterman, Leno, Kimmel et al. In other words, not really that funny.
What is his income compared to those who work around him?
I bet he earns, let me guess......$14 million a year?
IF he pays the camera guys, lighting people, makeup artists, floor sweepers, etc. $150,000 a year, he STILL outearns them by 93 times!
We all know that he doesn't pay that well.
More likely, they make about $50,000.......stewart earns 270 times what his average employee makes!
Why are lefties so easily bought into this BS?
He is good at what he does.....that is why he earns what he does.....so he should just shut the hell up and make people laugh.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Right, how much of his own money does this rich hypocrite and people of his ilk put up to help "the poor"?
