Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-13-2014, 04:05 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,371,187 times
Reputation: 17261

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The height of the baby boom was 1957.
These folks won't be turning 66-67 for another 10 years.
For them 65 is just medicare not full SS.

The youngest of the baby boomers is just 46 years old..still has another 20 years to full SS retirement.

We've only just started seeing the effects of boomer retirement (or lack of) on society.
Baby boomers 1946 and 1960's weighted more heavily towards the 1946 range. with a rapid drop afterwards.

the initial ones are hitting 69, So yeah we're seeing them impact heavily right now, and its going to keep on for a bit. The thing is...what all is it going to do? There was an assumption that we'd see a lot of them retire, but the depression has kept a lot more of them working then expected.

With the economy improving, are we going to see a lot of them start to retire you think? Or have they lost too much during the depression?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2014, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Baby boomers 1946 and 1960's weighted more heavily towards the 1946 range. with a rapid drop afterwards.

the initial ones are hitting 69, So yeah we're seeing them impact heavily right now, and its going to keep on for a bit. The thing is...what all is it going to do? There was an assumption that we'd see a lot of them retire, but the depression has kept a lot more of them working then expected.

With the economy improving, are we going to see a lot of them start to retire you think? Or have they lost too much during the depression?
Lack of savings is what woke them up.
The boomers led the age of the "consumer".
Those with money have retired. Those without are still working.

One guy I worked with was 66 when I left. He had put three kids through private college and then paid for one wedding. He was tapped out and then figured he had to keep working because his pension just wouldn't pay the bills..and he did still have a mortgage. Boomers upgraded their homes.

Boomers are going into retirement with mortgages, car loans and CC debt.
And pensions/401Ks aren't enough to live on.

Of course this does not apply to all.


Retirement Living: Debt holds many Boomers back
The National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC), which helps people who are having trouble paying their bills, says one-third of its 3 million clients nationwide last year were 55 or older, up 7 percentage points in two years. Nearly 15% are over 65. That's scary.
..
American Consumer Credit Counseling, which says 25% of its clients are 55 and older, paints a similar picture. Seniors are going into retirement still carrying debt, including mortgages, credit card debt and student loan debt. They are depleting their savings and retirement accounts just to make ends meet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2014, 05:05 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,371,187 times
Reputation: 17261
For a name like HappyTexan that was depressing as all heck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2014, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
For a name like HappyTexan that was depressing as all heck.
Hey..that's reality today.

The Silent Generation grew up during the depression.
They were the ones that retired debt free with pensions.
They were the ones that lived in the same house for 30 years and drove cars forever and a day.

The boomers were the first "consumers".
They traded up, had kids later, used "credit" like it was water and thought they would be young forever.

The early boomers are not as bad off as the later boomers regarding savings/debt/pensions.


Imagine boomers near retirement still paying off their student loans ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2014, 05:17 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,371,187 times
Reputation: 17261
Im sure thats part of it, but the other part is that before the boomers, jobs were often for life, and had a retirement plan provided. Things have changed.

Now social security is viewed as the retirement plan more and more, and pay is so low that most people cannot realistically pay into a good 401k, and a sudden job loss can wipe that 401K out if one exists.

I think the boomers will face the worst retirement of all. They will miss out on some of the huge technological changes that will make retirement less expensive, and they wont live long enough for a expanded safety net.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2014, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion View Post
How much do you see the retirement of baby boomers affecting U.S employment numbers going into the future?
So many of the "Bommers" turning 65 are not retiring, we will have to revisit topic this once they actually start retiring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2014, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Im sure thats part of it, but the other part is that before the boomers, jobs were often for life, and had a retirement plan provided. Things have changed.

Now social security is viewed as the retirement plan more and more, and pay is so low that most people cannot realistically pay into a good 401k, and a sudden job loss can wipe that 401K out if one exists.

I think the boomers will face the worst retirement of all. They will miss out on some of the huge technological changes that will make retirement less expensive, and they wont live long enough for a expanded safety net.
It was the boomers that started the "job hopping" trend.
That's when 401Ks came into the picture to replace the pensions.
That "freed up people" to move to new jobs and take their retirement money with them.


And since then job hopping has become the norm.
There is no more company loyalty and that is on both sides ..companies don't want 30 year long employees and employees don't want to be locked into jobs for life anymore.

Yes, the scene has changed and I watched it happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2014, 05:27 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,371,187 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It was the boomers that started the "job hopping" trend.
That's when 401Ks came into the picture to replace the pensions.
That "freed up people" to move to new jobs and take their retirement money with them.


And since then job hopping has become the norm.
There is no more company loyalty and that is on both sides ..companies don't want 30 year long employees and employees don't want to be locked into jobs for life anymore.

Yes, the scene has changed and I watched it happen.
I came into it when the company pension was just gone. My father had one from a company...but I'd never see one unless I went military for 20-30, government, or extremely large company-and even the large companies have gotten rid of them for everyone outside of the C level.

I think it will force some changes eventually. Not sure if they will be good or bad, but I can't see whats going on as being a sustainable trend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2014, 05:39 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,951 posts, read 49,189,517 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Imagine boomers near retirement still paying off their student loans ?
Wait till our kids get to retirement age. Hope they've learned some saving lessons from this last downturn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2014, 05:42 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,371,187 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Wait till our kids get to retirement age. Hope they've learned some saving lessons from this last downturn.
I have 8 kids, and know tons of their friends. If they're any guide....nope. Yeah they get saving, etc...but.....they just arent making enough money, nor do I see them making enough money for quite some time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top