Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,824,304 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoniDanko
Kids accidentally drown when left unattended, and a small amount of children accidentally shoot themselves or sometimes others when left unattended. The way to logically solve both problem is to place the focus on parents doing their jobs instead of focusing on banning and removing everything simply based on the actions of 0.00001% of a few irresponsible parents. So your sarcastic analogy makes NO LOGICAL SENSE AT ALL. Also, it makes no sense to say that you want to save children's lives, but do NOT want to ban objects that children could accidentally kill themselves with, but want to ONLY ban items that the same exact child could use to kill another child with. Either way you still have 1 dead kid Einstein.
Neither does your oak tree nonsense. The acorn would be seen as sperm and NOT as a growing tree. If you killed a planted seedling that just sprouted, then yes, you killed a growing oak tree... So your analogy has NO CREDIBILITY AT ALL!
I see you know your acorns. See it's called a seed. And its made up from when two trees get it on.
You mention sperm as if it was one thing. Which it is. And which acorns are not. They are the result of a combo of two things. So, that would mean that statement has NO CREDIBILITY AT ALL.
Then again, the thread is a about kids shooting kids. Maybe we should get back on track.
I see you know your acorns. See it's called a seed. And its made up from when two trees get it on.
You mention sperm as if it was one thing. Which it is. And which acorns are not. They are the result of a combo of two things. So, that would mean that statement has NO CREDIBILITY AT ALL.
Then again, the thread is a about kids shooting kids. Maybe we should get back on track.
You're correct. A seed is "sometimes" a combo of a male and female plant, but "sometimes" it is not. Some plants do not need to be pollinated by another plant to be able to produce seeds. Either way, the comparison that you're trying to make is still completely idiotic. Unlike a fetus, a seed/acorn is not growing into a living thing. For the sake of our discussion and in human terms, a seed is still similar to sperm. Once a seed has germinated, then and only then would it be comparable to a fetus growing in an uterus. So, that would mean your statement STILL has NO CREDIBILITY AT ALL. You're statement STILL MAKES NO SINCE.
Last edited by DoniDanko; 01-20-2014 at 11:51 PM..
Children can be taught to swim. How can a child be taught to not be shot?
The vast majority of "children" getting shot are in major metro areas where they or the cousin\brother\etc. they are standing next to or riding with in a care are targeted by a rival gang.
Chicago noted that last year in their reporting on their 500+ shooting victims. 75% or more gang\drug related.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,824,304 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoniDanko
You're correct. A seed is "sometimes" a combo of a male and female plant, but "sometimes" it is not. Some plants do not need to be pollinated by another plant to be able to produce seeds. Either way, the comparison that you're trying to make is still completely idiotic. Unlike a fetus, a seed/acorn is not growing into a living thing. For the sake of our discussion and in human terms, a seed is still similar to sperm. Once a seed has germinated, then and only then would it be comparable to a fetus growing in an uterus. So, that would mean your statement STILL has NO CREDIBILITY AT ALL. You're statement STILL MAKES NO SINCE.
I used an acorn as an example. You said it was a sperm. Which is one thing. Not two. A sperm is one thing. An acorn is a combination of two things. So, you don't know what an acorn is. We get this. Your statement STILL has NO CREDIBILITY AT ALL. You're statement STILL MAKES NO SINCE.
Sense, even.
Yours makes none. The more you type, the more you're wrong. Keep typing, bro. Let's see how even more wrong you can be.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
