Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:23 AM
 
59,255 posts, read 27,435,954 times
Reputation: 14325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
It's amazing with all of the lying that Obama has done that he still has a 40% approval rating.
"You can fool some of the people ALL of the time..."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:26 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,487,684 times
Reputation: 9441
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Objectively, this is pretty astounding. Considering how unpopular the Iraq War was at this juncture, it is downright amazing that Obama polls worse than Bush at this point in his Presidency. This is no small matter at all.
Keep in mind that the press gave Bush a free pass on Iraq (they asked no questions going in and asked no questions when we left without wmd`s) but beat Obama silly over a bad web site.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:27 AM
 
59,255 posts, read 27,435,954 times
Reputation: 14325
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
It's amazing that some are so obsessed with Obama.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't be talking about our SITTING President?

After all, it's not like people EVER talking about the sitting President in the past.

But, I'm SURE you talked a lot about Bush and probably still do.

"If you can't take it, don't dish it out."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:29 AM
 
59,255 posts, read 27,435,954 times
Reputation: 14325
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Tea party Check
Medicare check
Military Check
Va Check

Well you are consistent. It can't be that someone simply disagrees with his policies. Nope never, it can only be about race.
Bush used Haliburton. Big scandal for those leaning left.
Obama uses Haliburton. No big deal
Bush and Katrina . Big Scandal, Bush didn't visit soon enough, he didn't care.
Obama and the oil spill. No big deal.
Bush and deficit spending. Bad
Obama and deficit spending. Good for economy.
Bush lies. Bad
Obama lies. What he really meant was.
The list really is endless. The difference is who is making the excuses.
"Bush used Haliburton. Big scandal for those leaning left.
Obama uses Haliburton. No big deal"

And they NEVER complained when Clinton gave Haliburton its FIRST NO BID contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:30 AM
 
59,255 posts, read 27,435,954 times
Reputation: 14325
Quote:
Originally Posted by borregokid View Post
Arent these polls telephone-landline polls. Who is sitting at home watching Lawerece Welk re-runs and putting in their VCR recordings of Hee-Haw? Between firing up their oxygen generators the Tea Partiers have plenty of time to answer the phone. Gallup thought Romney was going to win.
Spoken like a true "kid"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:40 AM
 
59,255 posts, read 27,435,954 times
Reputation: 14325
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
I was doing reasonably well when Bush was President and I am doing reasonably well with Obama as President. So, on the personal front, I give them both a thumbs up.

[i can't speak for the rest of the country]
you are not unusual. people who sell plywood do well when a hurricane is predicted.

Auto body shops do well after a snow or rain storm,

People in the building trade do well after a hurricane, tornado, etc.

That doesn't mean They weren't doing well BE ORE these catastrophes.

Some are fortunate enough that whoever is President doesn't affect their livelihood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:41 AM
 
59,255 posts, read 27,435,954 times
Reputation: 14325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
Interesting....so it's instant gratification vs long-range prosperity. I knew when GWB inherited a surplus and I received a $300 check in the mail, there was gonna be trouble. I did watch some good films on that VCR though.
"when GWB inherited a surplus" PSST! He NEVER inherited a surplus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:42 AM
 
Location: The South
7,493 posts, read 6,277,828 times
Reputation: 13010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Britt Reid View Post
Just think, Bush at 43% was after years of liberal mainstream media bashing. In contrast, with Obama's literal sycophant lapdog media, he gets a 40% and I believe that's really a affirmative action bump. If he was treated like Bush was, Obama would most likely be in the 20% range.

Presidential Job Approval Center
It should be between 0 and 1%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Holly Springs, NC USA
3,457 posts, read 4,658,379 times
Reputation: 1907
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
Keep telling yourself that. It is common fact that Bush, the ultimate failure, inherited a surplus.

The Budget and Deficit Under Clinton

Clinton’s large budget surpluses also owe much to the Social Security tax on payrolls. Social Security taxes now bring in more than the cost of current benefits, and the "Social Security surplus" makes the total deficit or surplus figures look better than they would if Social Security wasn’t counted. But even if we remove Social Security from the equation, there was a surplus of $1.9 billion in fiscal 1999 and $86.4 billion in fiscal 2000. So any way you count it, the federal budget was balanced and the deficit was erased, if only for a while
Here we go again. Funny money - there was NO SURPLUS. This myth has been laughed at, proven to be false etc. countless times. Look up The Myth of the Clinton Surplus and the try to understand it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 07:47 AM
 
Location: Holly Springs, NC USA
3,457 posts, read 4,658,379 times
Reputation: 1907
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
Keep in mind that the press gave Bush a free pass on Iraq (they asked no questions going in and asked no questions when we left without wmd`s) but beat Obama silly over a bad web site.
If you think it is just a bad website, then you are truly fooled. This is something that can have an affect on millions of people lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top