Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:08 AM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,997,659 times
Reputation: 2308

Advertisements

I will go for over...63 is a fair but unequal number where as "The One" is the loneliest that I ever knew...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:10 AM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,997,659 times
Reputation: 2308
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
Or, in Obama's case, a toke on a joint with your kids!
That's 420 dude...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,632 posts, read 10,390,278 times
Reputation: 19524
What the president says should matter and I was raised, and I raised my children, that whether you agree or disagree with the sitting president, it is incumbent on us as Americans and voters to listen and pay attention.

That said, I am NOT going to watch Tuesday. Hypocritical of me, yep, but when Obama speaks, he is so utterly condescending to his political foes, his disdain for those who don’t share his policies reeks with arrogance, so at this point what difference does it make if I don’t hear his chosen words?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 10:06 AM
 
Location: WY
6,262 posts, read 5,069,270 times
Reputation: 7998
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
What the president says should matter and I was raised, and I raised my children, that whether you agree or disagree with the sitting president, it is incumbent on us as Americans and voters to listen and pay attention.

That said, I am NOT going to watch Tuesday. Hypocritical of me, yep, but when Obama speaks, he is so utterly condescending to his political foes, his disdain for those who don’t share his policies reeks with arrogance, so at this point what difference does it make if I don’t hear his chosen words?
Agree completely with your first paragraph. And for the first time in many years I'm not going to be watching it either. I will surf a couple of channels and hear the highlights and listen to the breakdown of the speech after it's all said and done, but I just can't listen to him anymore.

I can't watch idiots stand up and clap every 20 seconds. I can't listen to words he doesn't mean. I can't stand the sight of him or listen to his voice for that long anymore. I don't believe that he has been a good president. I don't believe what he says. I don't have faith in him that he has the best interest of all Americans at heart. So I'll skip it and watch the after-shows instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
I'd say he would use those words as well as "common sense" and "bipartisan" repeatedly and often.

The bet would have to be made on how often
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,025 posts, read 14,205,095 times
Reputation: 16747
You can't put lipstick on stealing from one to give to another, whether it is by the private sector or the public sector.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
You can't put lipstick on stealing from one to give to another, whether it is by the private sector or the public sector.
I think it's obvious some are not paying their fair share of taxes. The wealthiest, can pay more. We could require the poorest to pay more, yes. But we already subsidize them through food stamps and Medicaid. Defeats the purpose to tax them.

Our spending goes to social security, medicare/medicaid, and defense.

What do you want to cut or change?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 11:04 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,543,209 times
Reputation: 6392
Why would anyone with a more than a 2 digit IQ care anymore what he says?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 11:06 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,049,136 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
I think it's obvious some are not paying their fair share of taxes. The wealthiest, can pay more. We could require the poorest to pay more, yes. But we already subsidize them through food stamps and Medicaid. Defeats the purpose to tax them.

Our spending goes to social security, medicare/medicaid, and defense.

What do you want to cut or change?
And the swift can afford to run slower in a race to make things "even".

The beautiful can afford to stop wearing makeup to make things "even".

The great actors can afford to pass a role on to a struggling actor to make things "even".

The highly intelligent can afford to purposely get answers wrong in order to make things "even".

Great athletes can afford to play a little less than their best in order to make things "even".

If the above sound ridiculous, show me where it's any different than passionate, driven people purposely slowing down their ambitions so others can "catch up"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2014, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
And the swift can afford to run slower in a race to make things "even".

The beautiful can afford to stop wearing makeup to make things "even".

The great actors can afford to pass a role on to a struggling actor to make things "even".

The highly intelligent can afford to purposely get answers wrong in order to make things "even".

Great athletes can afford to play a little less than their best in order to make things "even".

If the above sound ridiculous, show me where it's any different than passionate, driven people purposely slowing down their ambitions so others can "catch up"?
So, tax the poor, or let them starve.

What's your choice?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top