Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2014, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,408,272 times
Reputation: 6288

Advertisements

The amount of right-wingers who complained about U3 when it was at 10%: A BIG FAT ZERO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2014, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,469,405 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
really now....lets look at the numbers

month................year..........labor force...................employed..............unem ployed.........ue rate.....
January.............2014..........155,460,000..... ...........145,224,000............10,236.......... ...6.6
November......... 2013..........155,294.000............... 144,386,000........... 10,907............. 7.0
June................. 2008..........154,313.000.............. 145,737,000............. 8,575............... 5.6



population June 2008 303 million
population November 2013 319 million


hmmm we have gone up 16 million in population, since June 2008... but have LESS working people than that month....more people unemployed



the numbers don't look good
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,842,318 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
really now....lets look at the numbers

month................year..........labor force...................employed..............unem ployed.........ue rate.....
January.............2014..........155,460,000..... ...........145,224,000............10,236.......... ...6.6
November......... 2013..........155,294.000............... 144,386,000........... 10,907............. 7.0
June................. 2008..........154,313.000.............. 145,737,000............. 8,575............... 5.6



population June 2008 303 million
population November 2013 319 million


hmmm we have gone up 16 million in population, since June 2008... but have LESS working people than that month....more people unemployed



the numbers don't look good
What is your point?

Despite the population increasing 16 million, the net increase to the labor force between June 2008 and January 2014 was 1.1 million.

The Unemployment rate is still higher then it was in June 2008, but much lower then the 10% it hit because of the recession.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,436,896 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
What is your point?

Despite the population increasing 16 million, the net increase to the labor force between June 2008 and January 2014 was 1.1 million.

The Unemployment rate is still higher then it was in June 2008, but much lower then the 10% it hit because of the recession.
Well if we can get more people just dropping out then the rate will go below 6% and everyone will be happy again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,778,885 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Well if we can get more people just dropping out then the rate will go below 6% and everyone will be happy again.
Any chance that the rate would go up if the extended UI benefits were reinstated and those people were back on the rolls and counted as "officially" unemployed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,436,896 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by softblueyz View Post
Any chance that the rate would go up if the extended UI benefits were reinstated and those people were back on the rolls and counted as "officially" unemployed?
Now why should that happen ?
There's no need to extend benefits with the UE rate dropping each month and all this talk about the recovered economy. Even the Fed is pulling back saying we don't need their money any more.

Either times are good or times are bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,150,494 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
hmmm we have gone up 16 million in population, since June 2008... but have LESS working people than that month....more people unemployed

the numbers don't look good
Takers out-number Workers by a large margin; that margin will continually increase; it is long-term, meaning that's the situation for the next 70-80 years; and it's going to get ugly, unless someone smacks the Takers in the teeth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
The amount of right-wingers who complained about U3 when it was at 10%: A BIG FAT ZERO
Did you know the year is 2014?

Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
This is why unemployment figures are not a good indicator.
Whoever said they would be?

Unemployment doesn't exist in a vacuum. It's just one piece of the puzzle, just as employment, Labor Force Participation Rate, Employment-to-Population Ratio, Employment by Age Group, and an host of other things -- some not even related to employment -- are pieces of the puzzle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by softblueyz View Post
So the government does a "poll" the same as Gallop and Pew.
No, some of the interviews are conducted face-to-face.

And there is a difference, because the Census Bureau interviews only households, while Gallup interviews only individuals (for their Payroll-to-Population Data).

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Your post notes what unemployment insurance measures. If you are no longer on it of course you are not counted. We are talking about those who are unemployed, period.
There is no relationship between UE Benefits and the Unemployment Rate.

Another way of putting it is that when the government collects unemployment data, it doesn't give a damn who is or isn't collecting unemployment benefits and none of the government agencies ask the several States for data on unemployment benefits (except the IRS and Social Security and probably the NSA).

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
You "believe"? I know of not a single unemployed worker ever surveyed. You?
So? You're focused entirely exclusively on the individual. The Census Bureau does not interview individuals, rather it interviews households.

Look, this is real freaking simple.

The entire US is divided up into Census Tracts. There's about 85 Million of them, yet there are 114 Million Households. Obviously, some residences have more than one Household -- Mother (Household #1) caring for aging Father (Household #2) while Mother's adult Daughter lives there (Household #3) along with adult Daughter's live-in boyfriend (Household #4).

The decennial census is conducted using two forms, known as the short-form and the long-form. Only 1 in 10 residences get a long-form, or.....8.5 Million residences.

From those 8.5 Million residences, the Census Bureau will contact 30,000 residences each year and ask if they wish to participate in an annual study. It's voluntary. If the head of household agrees, then they participate for an entire year.

So each month --- for an entire year -- the Census Bureau will contact the same people to interview. About 3,000 of those interviews are conducted face-to-face, meaning a representative from the Census Bureau enters your home, plops down on your couch and interviews you. How many hours did you work? What was your pay? You saved all of your gasoline receipts, let me see them. How did many hours did you watch TV? How many hours did you surf the internet? What did you spend on healthcare? Utilities? Clothes? Food? How many times did you eat out? Did you go to the cinema show? And so on.

The other 30,000 are divided into groups and interviewed by telephone for 6 months at a time.

I guess the point is that this is not some purely random telephone survey.

The people in the survey are pre-selected and they participate monthly for 6-12 months.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'm 22 and just out of college. I'm looking for a job, how does the government know that? I was fired from my last job and not eligible for UI so I didn't sign up but I'm looking for a new job. How does the government know that?
Because you are not the only one so situated.

It's called statistical sampling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
If they don't even know you are unemployed how do they select you?
That's explained above.

Statistically....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,778,885 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post


No, some of the interviews are conducted face-to-face.

And there is a difference, because the Census Bureau interviews only households, while Gallup interviews only individuals (for their Payroll-to-Population Data).



There is no relationship between UE Benefits and the Unemployment Rate.

Another way of putting it is that when the government collects unemployment data, it doesn't give a damn who is or isn't collecting unemployment benefits and none of the government agencies ask the several States for data on unemployment benefits (except the IRS and Social Security and probably the NSA).



So? You're focused entirely exclusively on the individual. The Census Bureau does not interview individuals, rather it interviews households.

Look, this is real freaking simple.

The entire US is divided up into Census Tracts. There's about 85 Million of them, yet there are 114 Million Households. Obviously, some residences have more than one Household -- Mother (Household #1) caring for aging Father (Household #2) while Mother's adult Daughter lives there (Household #3) along with adult Daughter's live-in boyfriend (Household #4).

The decennial census is conducted using two forms, known as the short-form and the long-form. Only 1 in 10 residences get a long-form, or.....8.5 Million residences.

From those 8.5 Million residences, the Census Bureau will contact 30,000 residences each year and ask if they wish to participate in an annual study. It's voluntary. If the head of household agrees, then they participate for an entire year.

So each month --- for an entire year -- the Census Bureau will contact the same people to interview. About 3,000 of those interviews are conducted face-to-face, meaning a representative from the Census Bureau enters your home, plops down on your couch and interviews you. How many hours did you work? What was your pay? You saved all of your gasoline receipts, let me see them. How did many hours did you watch TV? How many hours did you surf the internet? What did you spend on healthcare? Utilities? Clothes? Food? How many times did you eat out? Did you go to the cinema show? And so on.

The other 30,000 are divided into groups and interviewed by telephone for 6 months at a time.

I guess the point is that this is not some purely random telephone survey.

The people in the survey are pre-selected and they participate monthly for 6-12 months.
To your first response above, I was asking the poster for confirmation to what s/he said.

My friend showed me the census she received from the Census Bureau. It was a booklet and wanted the smallest detail on each individual in the household. Might be meaningless to the person being asked, but it means something to the census. First she received the census by email, then it was followed by the booklet. If the booklet isn't returned completed she would have a visitor and possibly face a fine. That is not voluntary when you face punishment for not complying.

As to "polls" they are not random. They target sectors to get the results they seek.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 10:31 AM
 
1,730 posts, read 1,361,549 times
Reputation: 760
Anybody that thinks unemployment is lower than 20% is a retard
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 11:05 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,980,987 times
Reputation: 3396
The actual method the Household Surveys are done is explained here on the BLS website.

Chapter 1, Labor Force Data Derived from the Current Population Survey

Quote:
Labor Force Data Derived from the Current Population Survey

Collection Methods


Each month, during the calendar week containing the 19th day, interviewers contact a "responsible" person in each of the sample households in the CPS. At the time of the first enumeration of a household, the interviewer visits the household and prepares a roster of the household members, including their personal characteristics (date of birth, sex, race, ethnic origin, marital status, educational attainment, veteran status, and so on) and their relationship to the person maintaining the household. The interviewers enter this information into laptop computers. This roster is then checked for accuracy and brought up to date at each subsequent interview to take account of new or departed residents, changes in marital status, and similar items. The information on personal characteristics is thus available each month for identification purposes and for cross-classification with economic characteristics of the sample population.

Personal visits are preferred in the first month in which the household is in the sample. In other months, the interview generally is conducted by telephone. Approximately 70 percent of the households in any given month are interviewed by telephone. A portion of the households (10 percent) is interviewed via computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI), from three centralized telephone centers (located in Hagerstown, MD; Jeffersonville, IN; and Tucson, AZ) by interviewers who also use a computerized questionnaire.

At each monthly visit, a series of standard questions on labor market activity during the preceding week is asked about each household member 15 years of age and older. (As previously mentioned, the official labor force estimates pertain to those aged 16 and older.) The primary purpose of these questions is to classify the sample population into the three basic economic groups: The employed, the unemployed, and those not in the labor force.

At the end of each day's interviewing, the data collected are transmitted to the Census Bureau's central computer in Washington, DC. Once files are transmitted to the main computer, they are deleted from the laptops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top