Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-09-2014, 09:17 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,141,698 times
Reputation: 12920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
The AOL CEO is a loose cannon, I don't expect him to last.

Audio recording: AOL CEO fires employee during conference call.
It was supposed to be a conference call to rally the troops ahead of what would undoubtedly be hard times. And at first it sounded that way. But then at one point Armstrong can be heard saying (minute two of the recording), “Abel, put that camera down, now.” And then: “Abel, you’re fired. Out.” A few seconds later, he went on as if nothing had happened. The victim? Patch creative director Abel Lenz. Business Insider notes that if Armstrong fired Lenz for taking photographs it was an odd reason. Lenz always took photographs of meetings to then post in the company’s internal site.

AOL CEO Apologizes for Firing Employee During Conference Call - ABC News
AOL CEO Apologizes for Firing Employee During Conference Call
Abel is one of the nicest guys, too. I worked with him for several years. What a unprofessional way to fire someone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2014, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Tell me why the AOL which is viewed now as left wing
I was wondering when people would start dividing corporations into left and right, the good and the bad. First they divide the people and play they against each other, and then they divide the corporations. I guess division and strife is the name of the game these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,174,352 times
Reputation: 4233
Quote:
Originally Posted by SocialistAtheist View Post
Course wouldn't want that jerk to take a pay cut from his millions.

Why should HE take a pay cut? I would want every penny I earned or was contracted to earn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 07:00 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
The AOL CEO is a loose cannon, I don't expect him to last.

Audio recording: AOL CEO fires employee during conference call.
It was supposed to be a conference call to rally the troops ahead of what would undoubtedly be hard times. And at first it sounded that way. But then at one point Armstrong can be heard saying (minute two of the recording), “Abel, put that camera down, now.” And then: “Abel, you’re fired. Out.” A few seconds later, he went on as if nothing had happened. The victim? Patch creative director Abel Lenz. Business Insider notes that if Armstrong fired Lenz for taking photographs it was an odd reason. Lenz always took photographs of meetings to then post in the company’s internal site.

AOL CEO Apologizes for Firing Employee During Conference Call - ABC News
AOL CEO Apologizes for Firing Employee During Conference Call
Has nothing to do with the discussion since a cut in benefits couldnt take place without the boards authorization. So not only is the CEO discussing it, surely the board would have to be as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 07:01 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I was wondering when people would start dividing corporations into left and right, the good and the bad. First they divide the people and play they against each other, and then they divide the corporations. I guess division and strife is the name of the game these days.
Didnt you guys do that when Warren Buffet endorsed Obama? Ooh that was different..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Didnt you guys do that when Warren Buffet endorsed Obama? Ooh that was different..
A quote would be helpful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 08:08 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
A quote would be helpful.
So you're denying that left wingers were running around shouting that Buffet was a billionaire and because he endorsed Obama, that meant everyone should vote for him?

I'd have far more respect for you if you didnt deny the truth so often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
So you're denying that left wingers were running around shouting that Buffet was a billionaire and because he endorsed Obama, that meant everyone should vote for him?

I'd have far more respect for you if you didnt deny the truth so often.
You said "you guys", but I know I never said anything like that, so I asked for a quote. Now I know you cannot provide one. I didn't vote for Obama myself so why would I tell others to vote for him? But then again, none of it has anything to do with the topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
It could backfire on them, unless of course all of the other big companies decide to follow suit. Then what?
It did. The impulsive CEO apologized and abandoned plans to covert a pay day matching contribution to a year end lump sum match.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2014, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,165,825 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
I would not disagree in principle, but specific issues can be a factor.

There's a world of difference between publicly traded corporations and private corporations, LLCs, LLPs, GPs and such.

You're right in that LLCs, LLPs and private corporations can/may absorb the cost, but publicly traded corporations cannot do that. Publicly traded corporations must show a profit, and if they don't, then their stock price drops and they are prey to predators looking for a take-over.

That's why corporations are holding cash....cash is they only possible means to defend themselves...there is no other.

Remember Durant? General Motors fires Durant, so Durant teams up with Louis Chevrolet and they start making Chevrolet cars. The Chevrolet gains Market Share very rapidly, eating the Market Share of General Motors. Durant takes his profits and starts buying General Motors stocks, and the next thing you know...

....Durant owns 51% of GM stocks and has controlling interest. Durant calls a shareholder meeting --- his right as majority shareholder; nominates himself as the CEO of General Motors --- his right as majority shareholder; and then casts 51% of the votes for himself -- his right as majority shareholder.

So not only does Durant own General Motors, he is also the CEO.

That's how Life's Good bought up Zenith. Zenith couldn't compete globally, profits dropped, stock prices dropped and there's Life's Good selling globally making beau coup profits and buying up Zenith stock.

Doesn't Time-Warner own AOL?

Didn't Time just lay-off employees?

Maybe AOL is doing fine, but perhaps Time-Warner is struggling.

Somebody's got to stay profitable...

Mircea
Quote:

Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable for $45 billion
By By Ryan Nakashima February 13, 201

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Comcast Corp. will buy Time Warner Cable Inc. for about $45.2 billion in a deal that would combine the nation's top two cable TV companies and create a dominant force in creating and delivering entertainment.


The price amounts to $158.82 per share for Time Warner Cable and is about 17 percent above that stock's Wednesday closing price of $135.31. It tops a Charter Communications Inc. proposal to buy Time Warner Cable for about $132.50 per share.

Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable for $45 billion - Businessweek

Interesting.

Gotta wonder if this whole thing wasn't a stock-play.

Merging...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top