Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
On the basic science of climate change and mankind's contribution to it, it is measurable, but on what specifically will result from this contribution, the science is far from settled.
How apropos you would use him to support your argument.
And how appropriate you prop up Al Gore.....the owner of two huge electricity-guzzling mansions and a private jet! Who sold his TV station to a BIG OIL backed organization!!
Wrong. Anyone who says that C02 or the atmosphere traps heat is pretty ignorant about atmospheric science. The atmosphere absorbs radiation emitted by the Earth, but upon being absorbed, the radiation has ceased to exist by having been transformed into the kinetic and potential energy of the molecules. The atmosphere cannot be said to have succeeded in trapping something that has ceased to exist.
And how appropriate you prop up Al Gore.....the owner of two huge electricity-guzzling mansions and a private jet! Who sold his TV station to a BIG OIL backed organization!!
Anyone who brings up Al Gore on the subject of climate change only reveals themselves to be entirely clueless about the topic.
Al Gore is not, nor has he ever, been the spokesperson for science. His was only a lone voice in the wilderness who became a lightning rod for criticism because he was a politician.
Wrong. Anyone who says that C02 or the atmosphere traps heat is pretty ignorant about atmospheric science. The atmosphere absorbs radiation emitted by the Earth, but upon being absorbed, the radiation has ceased to exist by having been transformed into the kinetic and potential energy of the molecules. The atmosphere cannot be said to have succeeded in trapping something that has ceased to exist.
I quoted the Goracle. You know, the "expert" on AGW. The guy that made the hoax up. Who got rich off of the idiots.
Mankind's contribution is only "measurable" in the faulty climate models - the very same models that are giving us conflicting Pacific wind hypotheses (based, I might add, on the "weather du jour")
No, there is nothing "faulty" about basic science. When mankind emits 6 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide, this changes the albedo effect of our planet.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
