Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sigh. your local weather may not be representative of global temperatures.
Seriously these global warming denier threads get started over and over. Witht he same old "OMG its cold here" comments.
[quote]
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer says that climate models used by government agencies to create policies “have failed miserably.” Spencer analyzed 90 climate models against surface temperature and satellite temperature data, and found that more than 95 percent of the models “have over-forecast the warming trend since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH).”[LEFT]
Read more: Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong | The Daily Caller
[quote] Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong | The Daily Caller
[/LEFT]
[quote=SourD;33438453][quote]
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer says that climate models used by government agencies to create policies “have failed miserably.” Spencer analyzed 90 climate models against surface temperature and satellite temperature data, and found that more than 95 percent of the models “have over-forecast the warming trend since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH).”[LEFT]
Read more: Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong | The Daily Caller
Yeah right, you think this nut is credible? Spencer is a signatory to an Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming, which states that "Earth and its ecosystems – created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence – are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting"
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer says that climate models used by government agencies to create policies “have failed miserably.” Spencer analyzed 90 climate models against surface temperature and satellite temperature data, and found that more than 95 percent of the models “have over-forecast the warming trend since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH).”[LEFT]
Read more: Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong | The Daily Caller
Yeah right, you think this nut is credible? Spencer is a signatory to an Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming, which states that "Earth and its ecosystems – created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence – are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting"
He looked at the climate models. They are wrong and you can't dispute this. You can keep trying though.
Yeah it was 10degrees above normal in Thailand today.
That convinces me the world is burning up.
Better go dig a hole and hide in it, I'll call you when the crisis is over
Well the climate temps in Thailand are proof of man-made global warming, the cold temps in North America, well, that's just weather, and not worthy of comment.
clearly the weather in any individual location completely proves climate change. see how that works?
You bet'cha!!
And if a region is showing a warming trend because the wind and ocean currents are shifting warmer air and water into the region, then that too is proof that man-induced CO2 is warming the planet.... Even if you cannot prove that CO2 is causing the changes in those wind and ocean currents.
Post that info again. You've never had a reason not to post a page long post.
Anyway, let's say "a significant majority" of Climate scientists. ...
A significant minority.
Any person -- regardless of stature or credentials -- who mentions "Climate Change" or "Global Warming" in mere passing in a peer reviewed journal is counted as "supporting" the idiot "Global Warming/Climate Change" hysteria.
These are a tiny sampling of the studies that allegedly "prove" (snicker) Climate Change and "prove" (too funny too laugh) that 90% of "scientists" agree.....
A knowledge-aid approach for designing high-performance buildings
A Materials Life Cycle Assessment of a Net-Zero Energy Building
A new static lighting concentrator with optical coupler
A Reflection on Moral Distress in Nursing Together With a Current Application of the Concept
Aflatoxins in home produced cereals?
An Ant Colony Algorithm for efficient ship routing
College students' understanding of atmospheric ozone formation
Creation of Carbon Credits by Water Saving
Energy efficient residential house wall system
Environmental comparison of draught animal and tractor power
Game theory approach in decisional process of energy management for industrial sector
Heavy metal resistant anaerobic bacterial strains from brewery digester sludge
Plutonium Transport in the Environment
What caused the long duration of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum?
Who has become more open to nuclear power because of climate change?
Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition
See if you can distinguish Politics from Science...
No links are working. What the hell does cigarettes have to do with what we are talking about
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
