Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So judges should get to decide what our rights are? If a judge wants to allow polygamy, they should be allowed to do so?
Lol, what's it to you? The judge has not restricted anyone's rights, including yours, and has actually EXPANDED rights.
EXPANDED rights = more freedom.
Can you be so anti-liberty that you have a problem with the fact that the government is now starting to RECOGNIZE and accept a right that already existed? That they had previously suppressed by law?
Homosexuals are gaining special treatment under a broad definition something straight NORMAL people would never get,they are being allowed to threaten business's with lawsuits because those companies refuse to go against their religious beliefs that are constitutionally protected and make a cake for them or do their floral arrangement.We need to make it EXTREMELY hard to file a lawsuit in this country that way the scum and their blood sucking lawyers will find something better to do than harass people.
Well...how many businesses do you know that have turned away a heterosexual?
Several have been in the news,where I live I only know of a handful of degenerates including some shemale that was at the pawn shop...was disgusting...They ain't real open about it around here...
So judges should get to decide what our rights are? If a judge wants to allow polygamy, they should be allowed to do so?
Well who is an individual who doesnt divulge in it to decide on something that doesnt concern them? Obviously if you want to take multiple spouses you cant be offered the same kind of financial and tax benefits beyond one, but if you wish to call more than one your own and have certain guarenteed rights with them, why not? Its not something personally for me so i would feel obligated to abstain from voting on it.
LOL recognizing a marriage in a state where its illegal is in NO WAY a human right...christ sakes...
Marriage, in some form or another, has be practiced by humans for eons. The right of Marriage pre-dates the US Constitution. What the Constitution does is affirm that ALL Americans are able to enjoy that right.
Lol, what's it to you? The judge has not restricted anyone's rights, including yours, and has actually EXPANDED rights.
EXPANDED rights = more freedom.
Can you be so anti-liberty that you have a problem with the fact that the government is now starting to RECOGNIZE and accept a right that already existed? That they had previously suppressed by law?
Okay, thank you for clarifying your position. I agree with you.
Marriage, in some form or another, has be practiced by humans for eons. The right of Marriage pre-dates the US Constitution. What the Constitution does is affirm that ALL Americans are able to enjoy that right.
Where exactly does the Constitution address marriage? Certainly not in the 14th Amendment to guarantee citizenship to former slaves. Marriage is not in the Constitution, therefore each state can decide on it's own by authority of the 10th Amendment.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
