
02-12-2014, 02:15 PM
|
|
|
Location: Texas
14,967 posts, read 15,534,950 times
Reputation: 4574
|
|
Wendy Davis says she
She has previously expressed support for the limits already affirmed by the Supreme Court.
What a flip flopper.
Does she think she's going to keep raking in the dough from liberals now?
Last edited by afoigrokerkok; 02-12-2014 at 02:30 PM..
|

02-12-2014, 02:17 PM
|
|
|
Location: Great State of Texas
86,053 posts, read 79,899,746 times
Reputation: 27680
|
|
She's backing down to get more support.
All politicians do it and she's no different.
She will pander to whoever if it could get her more votes.
|

02-12-2014, 02:23 PM
|
|
|
Location: Pine Grove,AL
27,242 posts, read 14,288,397 times
Reputation: 5256
|
|
The filibuster that she did was never about the length of when an abortion can happen, it was about the bill itself and how it forced the closure of abortion clinics by requiring doctors to have admitting privileges in a Hospital in the state of Texas(it technically said within 15 miles of the clinic itself i think).
Im not sure if you didnt know that or if you are purposefully lying, but either way, you shoudl do more research.
|

02-12-2014, 02:31 PM
|
|
|
Location: Texas
14,967 posts, read 15,534,950 times
Reputation: 4574
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251
The filibuster that she did was never about the length of when an abortion can happen, it was about the bill itself and how it forced the closure of abortion clinics by requiring doctors to have admitting privileges in a Hospital in the state of Texas(it technically said within 15 miles of the clinic itself i think).
Im not sure if you didnt know that or if you are purposefully lying, but either way, you shoudl do more research.
|
It was 30 miles.
I'm not lying. I'm simply pointing out the discrepancies in what she said.
|

02-12-2014, 02:32 PM
|
|
|
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,517,009 times
Reputation: 2382
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok
Wendy Davis says she
She has previously expressed support for the limits already affirmed by the Supreme Court. Moreover, if her assertion that her filibuster was just about other provisions in the legislation is true, why didn't she say so at the time?
What a flip flopper.
Does she think she's going to keep raking in the dough from liberals now?
|
You must not be from Texas if you think the fillabuster and opposition to the law was just about the change form 24 weeks to 20.
Most women don't wait till the 24th week to abort. If they wait that long, most likely something has gone wrong with the pregnancy, which they would be allowed to abort after 24 weeks. All the 20 week mark does is move the third trimester late term abortion forward 4 weeks.
|

02-12-2014, 02:35 PM
|
|
|
Location: Great State of Texas
86,053 posts, read 79,899,746 times
Reputation: 27680
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251
The filibuster that she did was never about the length of when an abortion can happen, it was about the bill itself and how it forced the closure of abortion clinics by requiring doctors to have admitting privileges in a Hospital in the state of Texas(it technically said within 15 miles of the clinic itself i think).
Im not sure if you didnt know that or if you are purposefully lying, but either way, you shoudl do more research.
|
She previously opposed late term abortions except for medical reasons.
She has "changed her mind".
|

02-12-2014, 02:36 PM
|
|
|
Location: Texas
14,967 posts, read 15,534,950 times
Reputation: 4574
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones
You must not be from Texas if you think the fillabuster and opposition to the law was just about the change form 24 weeks to 20.
Most women don't wait till the 24th week to abort. If they wait that long, most likely something has gone wrong with the pregnancy, which they would be allowed to abort after 24 weeks. All the 20 week mark does is move the third trimester late term abortion forward 4 weeks.
|
I didn't say it was just about that. I never even said it was primarily about that. But that was a huge part of the bill and she pretty clearly stated she supported the limits already affirmed by SCOTUS. Now she says she could support such a ban and that she thinks SCOTUS will revisit the viability issue.
|

02-12-2014, 02:38 PM
|
|
|
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,517,009 times
Reputation: 2382
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan
She previously opposed late term abortions except for medical reasons.
She has "changed her mind".
|
So does anyone that accepts the Roe v Wade rulling. There are very few people that support abortions on demand whenever.
|

02-12-2014, 02:40 PM
|
|
|
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,517,009 times
Reputation: 2382
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok
I didn't say it was just about that. I never even said it was primarily about that. But that was a huge part of the bill and she pretty clearly stated she supported the limits already affirmed by SCOTUS. Now she says she could support such a ban and that she thinks SCOTUS will revisit the viability issue.
|
If SC ever changes viability limits we all will have to accept their ruling...kinda a moot point.
|

02-12-2014, 02:40 PM
|
|
|
Location: Great State of Texas
86,053 posts, read 79,899,746 times
Reputation: 27680
|
|
If she won she wouldn't have changed her stance.
But she lost and without doing this pivot she'd lose even more supporters.
She specifically addressed the 20 week issue with her opinion that Republicans were lying.
Now's she's changed her mind on that 20 week issue.
Pandering for votes.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|