Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But Clarence Thomas is a turd of a man and is one of the worse SCJs of all time.
And, on what basis do you make this claim, especially that he is "one of the worse [sic] SCJs of all time?"
Are there some particular opinions he has written that you disagree with that lead you to use such hyperbole to describe his performance as a justice? What is your educational background in law, and especially Constitutional Law that qualifies you to make such judgement?
Calling him a "turd of a man" (careful — some might say you are racist) when you know little or nothing about him personally? Or, are you falling back to the wild accusations of one Anita Hill, the opportunist liar that followed Thomas everywhere throughout her career (very unusual for someone being victimized to follow their harasser from place to place)?
Such statements reflect badly on your credibility, and forces one to question your intelligence.
I like Justice Thomas and he always seemed to be a regular guy that anyone could talk too. It is so sad to see how Democrats have tried to destroy this guy for decades.
And, on what basis do you make this claim, especially that he is "one of the worse [sic] SCJs of all time?"
Are there some particular opinions he has written that you disagree with that lead you to use such hyperbole to describe his performance as a justice? What is your educational background in law, and especially Constitutional Law that qualifies you to make such judgement?
Calling him a "turd of a man" (careful — some might say you are racist) when you know little or nothing about him personally? Or, are you falling back to the wild accusations of one Anita Hill, the opportunist liar that followed Thomas everywhere throughout her career (very unusual for someone being victimized to follow their harasser from place to place)?
Such statements reflect badly on your credibility, and forces one to question your intelligence.
I wouldn't call him any names, but of course anyone with half a brain knows that Justice Thomas has set new standards for ethics violations while serving on the highest court in the land. The color of his skin is completely irrelevant to how stunningly corrupt he is.
Those who are not deeply offended by a SCJ who has made millions of dollars by selling his SC votes are simply not paying attention, or are righties blinded by his desperately-needed role as a rare black conservative.
I wish I could say this story is surprising. But it isn't. Seems like most on the left are conditioned to think this way.
Obama really has done a number on the country. Remember how he promised to bring us together? What a knee slapper.
It would be awful if it were true, WHICH IT ISN'T! Comprehension 101......
Quote:
Holmes added that despite what people may have thought they heard, he didn’t say he hated Thomas because he was married to a white woman. “I said some people might think I’m against him because he’s married to a white lady,” Holmes said,
adding that he was the legislator who introduced Alabama’s constitutional amendment to repeal the ban on interracial marriage in 1999. The state had long stopped enforcing the law because the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled such laws unconstitutional,but Alabama was the last state in the country to still have such a law on its books. “I support interracial marriage 100 percent,” Holmes said.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.