Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-16-2014, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,645 posts, read 38,655,954 times
Reputation: 11780

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Why do Jews vote Democrat?

Or the Asian community?

Or the Arab community?
Or anyone with more than half a brain?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2014, 04:47 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,311,358 times
Reputation: 8958
It doesn't surprise me. The Democrats have always been the racist party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 04:54 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
It doesn't surprise me. The Democrats have always been the racist party.
The racist party is the one that's far more diverse than the other one, huh?

Take a snapshot of a Romney rally and an Obama rally....nuff said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 04:57 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,206,841 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucario View Post
Or anyone with more than half a brain?
LMAO.

Yeah, that too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 06:03 PM
 
199 posts, read 161,036 times
Reputation: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Why do Jews vote Democrat?

Or the Asian community?

Or the Arab community?
Obsession is a terrible odor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2014, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,134,390 times
Reputation: 3368
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
The racist party is the one that's far more diverse than the other one, huh?

Take a snapshot of a Romney rally and an Obama rally....nuff said.
It's funny how some people are actually that delusional...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2014, 04:40 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,311,358 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
But Clarence Thomas is a turd of a man and is one of the worse SCJs of all time.
And, on what basis do you make this claim, especially that he is "one of the worse [sic] SCJs of all time?"

Are there some particular opinions he has written that you disagree with that lead you to use such hyperbole to describe his performance as a justice? What is your educational background in law, and especially Constitutional Law that qualifies you to make such judgement?

Calling him a "turd of a man" (careful — some might say you are racist) when you know little or nothing about him personally? Or, are you falling back to the wild accusations of one Anita Hill, the opportunist liar that followed Thomas everywhere throughout her career (very unusual for someone being victimized to follow their harasser from place to place)?

Such statements reflect badly on your credibility, and forces one to question your intelligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2014, 04:59 AM
 
4,278 posts, read 5,178,918 times
Reputation: 2375
I like Justice Thomas and he always seemed to be a regular guy that anyone could talk too. It is so sad to see how Democrats have tried to destroy this guy for decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2014, 08:15 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,262,489 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
And, on what basis do you make this claim, especially that he is "one of the worse [sic] SCJs of all time?"

Are there some particular opinions he has written that you disagree with that lead you to use such hyperbole to describe his performance as a justice? What is your educational background in law, and especially Constitutional Law that qualifies you to make such judgement?

Calling him a "turd of a man" (careful — some might say you are racist) when you know little or nothing about him personally? Or, are you falling back to the wild accusations of one Anita Hill, the opportunist liar that followed Thomas everywhere throughout her career (very unusual for someone being victimized to follow their harasser from place to place)?

Such statements reflect badly on your credibility, and forces one to question your intelligence.
I wouldn't call him any names, but of course anyone with half a brain knows that Justice Thomas has set new standards for ethics violations while serving on the highest court in the land. The color of his skin is completely irrelevant to how stunningly corrupt he is.

Those who are not deeply offended by a SCJ who has made millions of dollars by selling his SC votes are simply not paying attention, or are righties blinded by his desperately-needed role as a rare black conservative.

A Brief History of Clarence Thomas' Ethical Entanglements - The Wire
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2014, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,980 posts, read 14,566,426 times
Reputation: 14862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Link: Clarence Thomas Is Wrong | National Review Online#!

See also: Democrat: I don’t like Clarence Thomas because “he’s married to a white woman” « The Greenroom

I wish I could say this story is surprising. But it isn't. Seems like most on the left are conditioned to think this way.

Obama really has done a number on the country. Remember how he promised to bring us together? What a knee slapper.
It would be awful if it were true, WHICH IT ISN'T! Comprehension 101......

Quote:
Holmes added that despite what people may have thought they heard, he didn’t say he hated Thomas because he was married to a white woman. “I said some people might think I’m against him because he’s married to a white lady,” Holmes said,
adding that he was the legislator who introduced Alabama’s constitutional amendment to repeal the ban on interracial marriage in 1999. The state had long stopped enforcing the law because the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled such laws unconstitutional,but Alabama was the last state in the country to still have such a law on its books. “I support interracial marriage 100 percent,” Holmes said.
http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/...s-an-Uncle-Tom-
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top