Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
with people like Piers Morgan. How are we supposed to take her seriously?
People need to put people like Piers Morgan in their place. He is trying to rally support to subvert the Constitution, namely the 2nd Amendment and Palin has been on his a$$ putting him in his place, not because she dislikes him but because she wants to keep our founding principles intact. That is what you call being patriotic.
Were 3 years away and Hillary hasnt even said she'll run yet and already the rightwing media are trying to destroy her.
I kind of wonder if that isn't the strategy - have Hillary continue to be coy on whether or not she's going to run so the cons can spend all their time, money, and energy trying to destroy her - and then, at some point, some good, solid Democratic candidates are going to be introduced (and Hillary won't be among them), throwing the cons into a tailspin.
.........if the media reported the facts on each candidates experience, policy and ideas. I would have to agree. The media never reported Sarah Palins great executive record as governor in the 2008 election. Her record showed that she was more qualified to govern compared to Obama who had zero executive experience. And people don't realize that as governor, Palin was the 2nd most powerful governor in the nation. Palin proved as governor she was able to work with democrats and get things accomplished that the previous governors of Alaska were unable to do. If she were to run and Hillary was her opponent, Palin's executive record would outshine Hillary. Hillary is plagued with scandal and the media has done their best to cover for her like they have with the putative president. The media needs to reform itself and stop being bias so it can report the facts on each candidates experience, policy and ideas. Palin says American need to return to it's founding principles and we have strayed off that path. I have to agree. I would encourage everyone to read the first link and watch the 2nd link before commenting instead of typing a impulsive biased knee jerk reaction. Please try to refrain from doing that. This thread is about having executive experience that can get this nation on the right track to prosperity as well the media reporting that experience.
.........if the media reported the facts on each candidates experience, policy and ideas. I would have to agree. The media never reported Sarah Palins great executive record as governor in the 2008 election. Her record showed that she was more qualified to govern compared to Obama who had zero executive experience. And people don't realize that as governor, Palin was the 2nd most powerful governor in the nation. Palin proved as governor she was able to work with democrats and get things accomplished that the previous governors of Alaska were unable to do. If she were to run and Hillary was her opponent, Palin's executive record would outshine Hillary. Hillary is plagued with scandal and the media has done their best to cover for her like they have with the putative president. The media needs to reform itself and stop being bias so it can report the facts on each candidates experience, policy and ideas. Palin says American need to return to it's founding principles and we have strayed off that path. I have to agree. I would encourage everyone to read the first link and watch the 2nd link before commenting instead of typing a impulsive biased knee jerk reaction. Please try to refrain from doing that. This thread is about having executive experience that can get this nation on the right track to prosperity as well the media reporting that experience.
Oddly, I agree with you. That she had some pretty impressive accomplishments during her first 2 years as governor that the media failed to report. However, once she was selected as McCain's running mate, it became painfully obvious that she was not qualified for leadership at the national level. Media bias or not, only she was reponsible for the stupid things that came out of her mouth. And her behavior and comments since that run have only reinforced that fact.
Britt, if the Republicans are ever to regain the presidency, people like you are going to have to start dealing with reality, you know that place where real people live. To think Palin could beat Clinton is a delusion, when the vast majority of people view her negatively. To even think Palin would even be qualified is a delusion. The majority of Americans will never vote for someone like Palin or Ted Cruz. It's time for the GOP to try to find valid, qualified candidates that can attract swing voters, independants, moderates, as well as a majority of the base.
Lol--who would give any weight to the political opinion of anyone called the "First Dude of Alaska?" His own wife doesn't even listen to him. He just follows behind her carrying her purse. He'd love for her to get elected to anything so he'll have a job.
no. you don't get it. your opinion means nothing. you mean nothing. you can do as you please, but know that we all laugh at you. you are within your rights to post on our internet.
And, thankfully, the ignore button works fine on Canadians, too.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
