Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If holding a weapon is the only way you can get people to pay attention to your opinions, it should tell you something about the quality of your opinions. Oh, and that isn't respect.
Hard to get your opinions heard when you have mass media/big money/left wing politicians against you. Fear/respect who cares...it gets the point across nice and clear.
Hard to get your opinions heard when you have mass media/big money/left wing politicians against you. Fear/respect who cares...it gets the point across nice and clear.
The opnions are being heard. The problem for you is people and THE LAW disagree with your opinion.
Fear/respect who cares...it gets the point across nice and clear.
That it does. But is "I am so bad at arguing my opinions, I need to resort to violence" a particularly worthwhile point to get across, in your opinion?
Sure, if I find myself faced with an enraged gorilla, I will probably readjust my behavior as regards ownership of bananas. That's not respect, it doesn't make the gorilla right, and it ultimately tends to end badly for the gorilla.
Good luck getting a Constitutional Amendment, you have better chances of winning the lottery than seeing a Constitution Amendment that says marriage is between a man and a woman.
A congressman from Kansas has drafted a bill with the intention of amending the US Constitution that will declare marriage is restricted to only opposite sex couples.
It seems unlikely this effort will see fruition.
However, it must be pointed out that a constitutional amendment is the one option - and perhaps the only option - opponents of legalized same-sex marriage have.
The major polling organizations - Gallup, Pew, Quinnipiac, etc. - have published data that says the majority of Americans are in support of marriage equality. Therefore, all of these protestations made by those opposed to it, I think, are in vain.
A congressman from Kansas has drafted a bill with the intention of amending the US Constitution that will declare marriage is restricted to only opposite sex couples.
It seems unlikely this effort will see fruition.
However, it must be pointed out that a constitutional amendment is the one option - and perhaps the only option - opponents of legalized same-sex marriage have.
The major polling organizations - Gallup, Pew, Quinnipiac, etc. - have published data that says the majority of Americans are in support of marriage equality. Therefore, all of these protestations made by those opposed to it, I think, are in vain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet
They should call the bill what it really is.
The Ability to Discriminate Regardless of Supreme Court Rulings Act of 2014.
That seems to be the gist of the bill that just passed in Kansas:
This guy thinks he's a martyr, doesn't he? He only commits to losing fights because it's safe....he never would have to take responsibility for any controversial legislation.
Is this really what the GOP needs? More intellectual dishonesty and rhetoric in favor of actually working together and coming up with legislation? Are they rusty because they haven't done this in decades?
Sue and Jane, and Bob and Steve, can marry in my state and a number of others, with more coming soon.
No matter how often you repeat the mantra of "between man and woman," it is only wishful thinking on your part.
The mantra that bears repeating is: Marriage Equality is coming to all 50 states. Believe it!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.