Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-22-2014, 06:36 AM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,945,174 times
Reputation: 5356

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
LOLZ. It's because Al Gore was wrong, the whole alarmist theory is wrong so far. However, you country rubes take that as the whole theory is wrong. Ah to be so ignorant about the world.

Interesting. Care to enlighten us "rubes" how the "whole theory" differentiates from the "whole alarmist theory"?
(And which one did those 97%ers declare "settled"???????)

 
Old 02-22-2014, 06:55 AM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,945,174 times
Reputation: 5356
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Are you kidding? Do you really think that we somehow manufacture CO2 when we breath? The amount of CO2 we exhale is exactly the same amount of CO2 that was in the air that we inhaled....You really need schooling if you are serious.

You should look up cellular respiration before you get too carried away with your insults.
 
Old 02-22-2014, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,540 posts, read 37,140,220 times
Reputation: 14001
The carbon dioxide we exhale does not contribute to global warming for the simple reason that we also take up an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide from the air, albeit indirectly. Everything we eat can be traced back to photosynthesis, the process by which plants take up carbon dioxide from the air and use it to produce the vast array of organic compounds needed for life. » Humans and animals exhale carbon dioxide with every breath. Why is this not considered to be a problem as far as global warming goes? Office for Science & Society

We are all part of the carbon cycle. Carbon Cycle and the Earth's Climate
 
Old 02-22-2014, 09:31 AM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,945,174 times
Reputation: 5356
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
The carbon dioxide we exhale does not contribute to global warming for the simple reason that we also take up an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide from the air, albeit indirectly. Everything we eat can be traced back to photosynthesis, the process by which plants take up carbon dioxide from the air and use it to produce the vast array of organic compounds needed for life. » Humans and animals exhale carbon dioxide with every breath. Why is this not considered to be a problem as far as global warming goes? Office for Science & Society

We are all part of the carbon cycle. Carbon Cycle and the Earth's Climate
Why do AGW acolytes never admit that they were wrong?????
 
Old 02-22-2014, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,540 posts, read 37,140,220 times
Reputation: 14001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor View Post
Why do AGW acolytes never admit that they were wrong?????
It's not me that is wrong, it is you that will not bother to take the time to understand the carbon cycle...Perhaps the explanation needs to be dumbed down for you.....The reason CO2 is increasing in the oceans and atmosphere is because we are burning carbon that has been locked away in fossil fuels for millions of years which upsets the natural carbon cycle.

Geography4Kids.com: BGC Cycles: Carbon Cycle
 
Old 02-22-2014, 10:04 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,222,978 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
Up the road, depends on the severity.



Because the Dutch have used them successfully.



Sure they are. Show me otherwise.



May 3rd 2068.
All solutions for a problem that doesn't exist.

Besides, al-Gore bought three oceanfront homes. If the sea levels were to rise, he wouldn't waste money scammed by AGW.
 
Old 02-22-2014, 10:05 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,222,978 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
The carbon dioxide we exhale does not contribute to global warming for the simple reason that we also take up an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide from the air, albeit indirectly. Everything we eat can be traced back to photosynthesis, the process by which plants take up carbon dioxide from the air and use it to produce the vast array of organic compounds needed for life. » Humans and animals exhale carbon dioxide with every breath. Why is this not considered to be a problem as far as global warming goes? Office for Science & Society

We are all part of the carbon cycle. Carbon Cycle and the Earth's Climate
And neither do cow farts. Yet environazis want to regulate cow farts.
 
Old 02-22-2014, 10:18 AM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,945,174 times
Reputation: 5356
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
It's not me that is wrong, it is you that will not bother to take the time to understand the carbon cycle...Perhaps the explanation needs to be dumbed down for you.....The reason CO2 is increasing in the oceans and atmosphere is because we are burning carbon that has been locked away in fossil fuels for millions of years which upsets the natural carbon cycle.

Geography4Kids.com: BGC Cycles: Carbon Cycle

Hehe! I'm not the one that said this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur
Are you kidding? Do you really think that we somehow manufacture CO2 when we breath? The amount of CO2 we exhale is exactly the same amount of CO2 that was in the air that we inhaled....You really need schooling if you are serious.
(Perhaps, if you go delete that post, you can call me anti-science in your next!)
 
Old 02-22-2014, 10:22 AM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,118,333 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor View Post
Interesting. Care to enlighten us "rubes" how the "whole theory" differentiates from the "whole alarmist theory"?
(And which one did those 97%ers declare "settled"???????)
That human's action are responsible for climate change. The real debate is how significant our affects are, along with a better understanding of our climate. The rubes locked on to Gore and Hansen when they turned out to be incorrect but anyone who understands science realizes that it doesn't work by attaching validity to people.
 
Old 02-22-2014, 10:26 AM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,118,333 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
All solutions for a problem that doesn't exist.

Besides, al-Gore bought three oceanfront homes. If the sea levels were to rise, he wouldn't waste money scammed by AGW.
But you said climates cool and warm..... Even if we aren't responsible for the current warming we will still have to deal with the consequences of a warmer planet or a colder planet.

You think we can just tell nature, "Say, we aren't responsible for this, so you'll have to pay for it"?

It's amazing how ignorant and spiteful folks are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top