Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-17-2014, 11:09 PM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,872,015 times
Reputation: 2144

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
It's still called Germ Theory, mon ami.
The term "pleomorphism" was banned many years ago, but of late has been morphed with "polymorphism", so that now, they both mean polymorphism.

Well, isn't that . . . special?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2014, 11:59 PM
 
Location: where you sip the tea of the breasts of the spinsters of Utica
8,297 posts, read 14,166,733 times
Reputation: 8105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Liberal freaks are obviously to blame.

Since liberal freaks control all public education in the US via the NEA, and since liberal freaks are only interested in teaching politically correct communist indoctrination when they are not chemically castrating male children, and not an actual education......
This is a truly classic gemstone of rightwing "thinking!"

Yeah, uh ....... we liberals are always trying to chemically castrate children. Wouldn't it be great if all you tea partyers could take over education from the castrating commie liberals?

Last edited by Woof; 02-18-2014 at 12:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 12:03 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,776,567 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
It can get a bit blurry at times. For example, as you pointed out, we know very little about gravity, but yet we have Newton's law of universal gravitation. Newton's law only applies to weak gravitational fields, when extrapolated further it does not hold up. Which is where Einstein's Theory of General Relativity comes into play. So in this particular case you have a scientific theory modifying what was already established as a scientific law.
Laws are mathematical formulas for a certain phenomenon. Theories do not become Laws or vice versa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 12:04 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,776,567 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by nealrm View Post
How about the theory of relativity. It's still a theory. Yet we have tested it repeated by placing clocks on planes, rockets, satellites.... We have accelerated particles to nearly the speed of light to test it. We use it daily in the GPS system, in controlling satellites and probes. We have built clocks that have extreme levels of precision to test it. Yet it is still a theory. We don't say the fact of relativity, we says the theory of relativity.

Germs we can see, atoms we can see, gravity we can directly see the results. Those are facts.
And we have physical evidence of evolution. We've witnessed it in nature and in the lab. You just don't know what evolution is, thus you have no clue what would consist of "directly seeing results".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 12:09 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,776,567 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
We "evolved" from another species? LOL Give me proof. Only idiots believe that.
Actually, only idiots don't believe that. The majority of the smartest people on Earth accept the evidence of human evolution.

Hominid Species

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent

Humans are part of the Great Apes. Our closest relative is the Chimpanzee. We share 98.8% of our DNA with Chimpanzees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 12:44 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,548 posts, read 37,145,710 times
Reputation: 14001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Actually, only idiots don't believe that. The majority of the smartest people on Earth accept the evidence of human evolution.

Hominid Species

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent

Humans are part of the Great Apes. Our closest relative is the Chimpanzee. We share 98.8% of our DNA with Chimpanzees.
Wait just a minute Fiyero, there are some humans that haven't evolved quite as much as others...

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 12:47 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,202,108 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Wait just a minute Fiyero, there are some humans that haven't evolved quite as much as others...
Do you never tire of mocking God?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 12:59 AM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,548 posts, read 37,145,710 times
Reputation: 14001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
Do you never tire of mocking God?
How is that photo mocking your god? ....Perhaps you think Glenn Beck is a god?

Have you ever seen a chimp with alopecia? Do you really think humans and chimps are not related?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 01:16 AM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,872,015 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Our closest relative is the Chimpanzee.
Chimpanzees don't cover their private parts.

Without religion there can be no evolution.

http://mileyrcyrus.com/gallery/displ..._display_media

Last edited by Hyperthetic; 02-18-2014 at 01:25 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2014, 02:42 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,387,159 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by nealrm View Post
I find it interesting that calling the theory of evolution a theory gets such a response. Even calling it a good, strong theory generated many postings trying to refute that comment. As you stated above, a theory is a "rigorously tested statement of general principles that explains observable and recorded aspects of the world'. So let apply that definition to evolution. First rigorously tested - we have one test on a simple bacteria that supported the theory. That is a test, but it would be a very long stretch to call it rigorously tested. Next Observable aspects: have we repeated observed species evolving into new species. No - we have observed the end result and some intermediate stages that suggest species evolve, but we have not direct observed it happening. The time scale is to long. How about recorded aspects. Fossils are records of the past and from that standpoint evolution does explain what appears to be happening. But the fossil records are not complete with millions of years better records and many pages missing.

You stated that prediction from the theory of evolution remain true. What prediction would those be??

As I stated before, The theory of evolution is a theory.
Well yes the theory of evolution is a scientific theory ....which explains the fact of evolution. I don't mean to insult you but your post shows that your knowledge of evolution seems to be very limited. Likewise your understanding of what "rigorously tested statement of general principles that explains observable and recorded aspects of the world" actually means.

These articles might help you to understand better:

Evolution as Fact, Theory, and Path - Springer

Actionbioscience | Evolution: Fact and Theory

Last edited by Ceist; 02-18-2014 at 02:51 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top