Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2014, 06:10 PM
 
13,281 posts, read 7,827,395 times
Reputation: 2141

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
I guess that's why Nixon was elected. Such a hottie!
No one is entirely sure what Nixon did with his first name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2014, 06:12 PM
 
13,281 posts, read 7,827,395 times
Reputation: 2141
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
I never did get the appeal to women of Clinton. To me he was a bubba w/ bags under his eyes, probably from drug use. Probably a sex predator too. But from all reports, the women did swoon for him. Go figure.
His smile was different from Jimmy Carter's smile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2014, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,082 posts, read 14,280,446 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
There's a post about a hilarious bit of news about how contraband viagra (or perhaps even fake viagra) in Pakistan was found that had Obama's face on it. The picture I found appeared to be a classic James Bond pose with Obama's face photoshopped in.

There ARE, however, women who swoon at the notion of sexual congress with him.

The moment I saw it, however, the first words that came to my mind were...

URKEL WITH A WATER PISTOL

Now, maybe that gets liberal women's panties wet, perhaps not. I have no way of knowing.

I must presume so, because lots of them (and even some liberal men claim not to be gay) thought he was "powerful" (in an implied sexual way). The Clintons, on the other hand, merely reminded me of rednecks minus the common sense, but with fancy clothes.
Is that anything like Palin making Conservative men's pants too tight in the crotchtal area?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2014, 06:42 PM
 
48,505 posts, read 96,629,449 times
Reputation: 18304
Well it says something when you have sworn testimony of women who say if they didn't take him up on sex ;he dropped his pants and exposed himself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2014, 08:42 AM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,865,110 times
Reputation: 2460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Bill Clinton was elected because Ross Perot split the conservative vote.
It's like those speed skaters who fall and takes out the competion. The guy in 3rd place then wins.

Obama does make Bill look like a great President and negotiator.
Never thought I'd say that.
I forgot that! He indeed spilt the vote from Sen. Dole. Democrats circle the wagons well, but there down fall is theDNC may or may not get the right person!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2014, 08:56 AM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,947,760 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
Is that anything like Palin making Conservative men's pants too tight in the crotchtal area?
Leave it to you to be gratuitously stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2014, 08:58 AM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,947,760 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Awww. Always a lame excuse when the Republican loses. Someone else's fault.

Where is your personal responsibility? Perhaps Mitt took it with him when he left.
Hmmm?

Your comments aren't even on topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2014, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,191,161 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfman View Post
Let's get this out once and for all!

Bill Clinton was elected because the females of this country were attracted to him!!! That's it, nothing more!

He was f'able, just like the lesbian feminists community exclaimed "finally, a first lady they could f'k!"

This is how this country has willingly degraded into the new dark ages. Money and power are the only thing of value.
Bill Clinton was elected because he was running against George H. Bush, who was a nice man, but was a very out of touch president. He appeared very bored during the debates and could not answer simple questions such as "what is the price of a gallon of milk." There was a recession going on at the time, and he did not seem to care about people's economic problems at all. Many men voted for Bill Clinton, so by your logic they were all gay? Your comment is without any merit whatsoever and is just another reason why conservatives keep losing elections--they have no real clue why they lose. The density of the GOP thought regarding the electorate is a huge problem for them. The other part of the Bush ticket--Dan Quayle--was a moron and the entire country was aware that he walked into a classroom on camera and showed the children how to spell the word potato incorrectly. He was the laughing stock of the country, although a comedian's dream politician.

In other words the GOP had a weak ticket and weak candidates. The funny thing is that in 1988, the GOP picked Dan Quayle as the VP candidate because they thought he looked like Robert Redford and all the women would love him--he ended revolting them. So you actually have everything backwards. Bill Clinton ended up being a good president and your theory holds no water at all. He had higher average approval ratings than Reagan and the reason for that is not that anyone wanted to sleep with him. Perhaps you should study history and you will not make statements that belong in the National Enquirer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2014, 10:18 AM
 
13,281 posts, read 7,827,395 times
Reputation: 2141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
He had higher average approval ratings than Reagan and the reason for that is not that anyone wanted to sleep with him.
Many of the dickheads I know just wanted to BE him.

Never misunderestimate the power of vicarious pleasures.

He was a very "carefree" man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2014, 10:24 AM
 
13,281 posts, read 7,827,395 times
Reputation: 2141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post

In other words the GOP had a weak ticket and weak candidates. The funny thing is that in 1988, the GOP picked Dan Quayle as the VP candidate because they thought he looked like Robert Redford and all the women would love him
That is the "common sense" engineering section of the conservative brain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top