The Physics of 9/11 versus Conspiracy Theories about 9/11 (military, terrorists, elect)

[Ecstatic Magnet]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

A typo is "stumbling over your own words?" Fascinating.


Let no irony go unsmelted.


Run away from whatever you choose.

Staying on topic is running away?

I have a giggle at how fast posters come in here and get noticeably angry.

[PullMyFinger]

Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet

You're invoking God (something people believe with literally zero evidence) to denounce conspiracy theorists?

That's rich.

Oh there's a lot of evidence, you choose just not to see it.

[Ecstatic Magnet]

Originally Posted by PullMyFinger

Oh there's a lot of evidence, you choose just not to see it.

I could say the same thing to you, and it would mean just as much: jack ****.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Chin_Muzik_NJ

Still, the building did not "fall on" WTC7... it fell and pieces of the building hit WTC7!!

An absurd and pointless splitting of hairs. I hope it makes you feel better, it does nothing to help your actual argument.

Originally Posted by Chin_Muzik_NJ

The collapse of WTC7 was an obscene anomaly....only naive, NIST strokers take that story for face value.

Too bad for your offended sensibilities the "naive, NIST strokers" are right.

Originally Posted by Chin_Muzik_NJ

Surely, you can expound....no?

Why? You can look up "conspiracy" in any dictionary.

[girlfromipanemo]

Originally Posted by PullMyFinger

When I saw the first tower go down and I'm not a scientist but I've been in the trades for 3 decades and saw a lot of big structures built from the ground up. It made sense the way the tower went down. Metal fatigue and all that weight pushing straight down. The second took a little longer because the plane hit higher.

This debate is the strangest thing I guess I've ever seen, but there will always be people who won't believe what they see right before their eyes.

No wonder God doesn't make his presence obvious to us. Because people with no faith would still not believe.

You saw the building go down. Nobody is disputing that. People are asking how it went down. I know a lot of people don't like to ask questions, but don't get upset when some people do. Getting all the answers from the media isn't good enough for some, therefore, we ask questions.

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

An absurd and pointless splitting of hairs. I hope it makes you feel better, it does nothing to help your actual argument.


Too bad for your offended sensibilities the "naive, NIST strokers" are right.


Why? You can look up "conspiracy" in any dictionary.

It was a CONSPIRACY!

I looked it up.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet

Staying on topic is running away?

No. Trying to frantically ignore relevant evidence based on the feeble excuse that it is "off topic" is running away.

Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet

I have a giggle at how fast posters come in here and get noticeably angry.

Don't feel lonely. The Internet makes everyone Autistic.

[Ecstatic Magnet]

Nobody address the OP's point.

Instead we'll play the semantics game and muddy the topic into authority vs crazy.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Ecstatic Magnet

Nobody address the OP's point.

Perhaps you should actually read the thread before writing something quite that oblivious.

[PullMyFinger]

Originally Posted by girlfromipanemo

You saw the building go down. Nobody is disputing that.

I actually expected it to go down exactly like it did. In fact those metal beams held out longer than I thought they would. I was amazed that it went straight down but after learning more about the structure it made perfect sense.