Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's been study to show (monitored by Police, a driving instructor, and researchers) that most can operate a vehicle safely at 5x the current legal limit.
And back to the main kicker. Traffic fatalities have decreased an average of 9% in states where marijuana has been legalized medicinally.
There's been study to show (monitored by Police, a driving instructor, and researchers) that most can operate a vehicle safely at 5x the current legal limit.
And back to the main kicker. Traffic fatalities have decreased an average of 9% in states where marijuana has been legalized medicinally.
I've seen that study - good stuff.
Just pointing to others that there are in fact DWI processes in place.
Their nanogram number is definitely debatable.
Difference is there is no real test to check for driving while hiiii. That is the only issue I've ever really had with the whole legalization thing.
Unfortunately it is still imperfect as far as I know. I support the legalization but if you don't want nailed with a DUI I say you better invest in a company that will come up with one more precise.
There's been study to show (monitored by Police, a driving instructor, and researchers) that most can operate a vehicle safely at 5x the current legal limit.
Unfortunately this is exactly what many addicts think, and say. Very dangerous.
Quote:
And back to the main kicker. Traffic fatalities have decreased an average of 9% in states where marijuana has been legalized medicinally.
Traffic fatalities have dropped a heck of a lot more than that on average, and it has nothing to do with narcotics use and everything to do with car safety. What you should be asking is why the fatalities in these marijuana states has dropped less than the average.
Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 03-05-2014 at 05:28 PM..
I've seen that study - good stuff.
Just pointing to others that there are in fact DWI processes in place.
Their nanogram number is definitely debatable.
Definitely didn't intend to take away from your post. Thought it was great for those who don't know the law. I'd say a vast majority of most Americans don't. Was just adding some data to put things in perspective.
Unfortunately this is exactly what many addicts think, and say. Very dangerous.
Traffic fatalities have dropped a heck of a lot more than that on average, and it has nothing to do with narcotics use and everything to do with car safety. What you should be asking is why the fatalities in these states has dropped less than the average.
That is a lie. Flat out.
And to your first jab, no I'm not an addict and if I was, it would speak even lesser of you.
Keeping showing people the crazy of Prohibition. Can't hide from the truth.
I know a large number of my friends smoked when we were 17. Now granted, most of them I haven't followed their lives but from what I do know, very few of them ever moved on to cocaine.
And facts aren't facts simply because they are claimed to be on the internet.
I'll bet you that 99.9% of those who have used cocaine drank alcohol first.
But that would be just a guess. The fact remains that many addicts of hard drugs started by using marijuana.
You post a link of a post about driving trends from 1988. I'm not even going to tell you why it would be stupid to debate that reasoning.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.