Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2014, 11:40 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,077,752 times
Reputation: 5455

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
Nope, only the denier conspiracy side does that (mostly through ignorance, but sometimes deliberately). I bet you swallowed all the conspiracy drivel about Mann's hockey stick graph eh? No matter how many times it was validated by other researchers and other methods.
Wow.......you haven't paid much attention then about all the lies and fake data. Or you pretend it never happened which is what it appears. Good work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2014, 11:41 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,435,224 times
Reputation: 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Wow.......you haven't paid much attention then about all the lies and fake data. Or you pretend it never happened which is what it appears. Good work.
Like I said, you blindly swallow conspiracy drivel. I can't really commend that as 'good work' on your part.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 11:43 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,077,752 times
Reputation: 5455
I see you have nothing left to say..........like many of your type who blather nothing and are called on it. Good work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 11:55 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,435,224 times
Reputation: 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
I see you have nothing left to say..........like many of your type who blather nothing and are called on it. Good work.
Yep I have more to say. I'm calling you on your conspiracy blather about 'fake graphs and research'.

(Not that you would ever bother reading them. Facts tend to interfere with a good ole ignorant conspiracy rant.)

>>>>


These are the reports from the investigations that debunked the supposed 'climategate scandal' as conspiracy nonsense:

07/29/2010: EPA Rejects Claims of Flawed Climate Science

http://www.cce-review.org/pdf/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf

http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/CRUstatements/SAP

http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm79/7934/7934.pdf

http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm79/7934/7934.pdf

http://www.nsf.gov/oig/search/A09120086.pdf

Quotes from the reports:

"there exists no credible evidence that Dr. Mann had or has ever engaged in, or participated in, directly or indirectly, any actions with an intent to suppress or to falsify data".

"The so-called “trick” was nothing more than a statistical method used to bring two or more different kinds of data sets together in a legitimate fashion by a technique that has been reviewed by a broad array of peers in the field."

"The scientists’ rigor and honesty are not in doubt".

"found this was simply a candid discussion of scientists working through issues that arise in compiling and presenting large complex data sets."

"The evidence that we have seen does not suggest that Professor Jones was trying to subvert the peer review process. Academics should not be criticised for making informal comments on academic papers".

"no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice in any of the work of the Climatic Research Unit".

"Professor Jones’s actions were in line with common practice in the climate science community".

"no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice in any of the work of the Climatic Research Unit".

"there is no substance to the allegation against Dr. Michael E. Mann".

"In the instance of the CRU, the scientists were not legally allowed to give out the data".

"no evidence in the CRU emails that NOAA inappropriately manipulated data".

"Finding no research misconduct or other matter raised by the various regulations and laws discussed above, this case is closed".

"The focus on Professor Jones and CRU has been largely misplaced. On the accusations relating to Professor Jones's refusal to share raw data and computer codes, we consider that his actions were in line with common practice in the climate science community. We have suggested that the community consider becoming more transparent by publishing raw data and detailed methodologies. On accusations relating to Freedom of Information, we consider that much of the responsibility should lie with UEA, not CRU."

"In addition, insofar as we have been able to consider accusations of dishonesty--for example, Professor Jones's alleged attempt to "hide the decline"--we consider that there is no case to answer. Within our limited inquiry and the evidence we took, the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact. We have found no reason in this unfortunate episode to challenge the scientific consensus as expressed by Professor Beddington, that "global warming is happening [and] that it is induced by human activity"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 12:18 AM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,077,752 times
Reputation: 5455
NASA falsified their data too.......you forgot to put that nonsense in there. Keep trying hero........you folks have been found out and are done.........quote all the articles you want that are in on the whole thing but it doesn't make it so. It is amazing to watch you folks defend madness. It is what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 12:34 AM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,380,289 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Updated Global Temperature: No global warming for 17 years, 6 months – (No Warming for 210 Months) | Climate Depot



Are you going to believe me, or what you see with your own eyes?

~ Groucho Marx
You can't use Climate Depot as a valid source and here's why.

Marc Morano, the executive director of ClimateDepot.com, is one of climate denial's most prolific media-heads. In 2012, Morano was named the Climate Change Misinformer of the Year by conservative watchdog group Media Matters for America.
ClimateDepot, who's sole purpose is to spread misinformation about climate change, is a project of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a conservative think tank which has received funding from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and foundations which challenge climate science.
Who is Marc Morano? - Greedy Lying Bastards
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 01:19 AM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,958,836 times
Reputation: 1119
Looks like the Big Blank check is being brought into the mix. (they seem to like that word multiplier)

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 Official Air Force...
From 1996 paper.
quote:
Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025 Air Force 2025
...
A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary.

Pentagon Warns Increase In Terrorism Due To Global Warming ...

quote:
in its latest Quadrennial Defense Review, the US Department of Defense (DoD), stressed threats to global stability and American hegemony posed by climate change warning that that an erratic climate will likely cause increased “terrorist activity,” among other impacts..."The pressures caused by climate change will influence resource competition while placing additional burdens on economies, societies, and governance institutions around the world...these effects are threat multipliers."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 04:07 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,435,224 times
Reputation: 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
NASA falsified their data too.......you forgot to put that nonsense in there. Keep trying hero........you folks have been found out and are done.........quote all the articles you want that are in on the whole thing but it doesn't make it so. It is amazing to watch you folks defend madness. It is what it is.
Yes dear, you just keep on skim reading those tabloid headlines and barfing up your Beckisms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 04:10 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,961,554 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
You can't use Climate Depot as a valid source and here's why.

Marc Morano, the executive director of ClimateDepot.com, is one of climate denial's most prolific media-heads. In 2012, Morano was named the Climate Change Misinformer of the Year by conservative watchdog group Media Matters for America.
ClimateDepot, who's sole purpose is to spread misinformation about climate change, is a project of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a conservative think tank which has received funding from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and foundations which challenge climate science.
Who is Marc Morano? - Greedy Lying Bastards
Media Matters for America..."Nuff said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 11:19 AM
 
Location: midwest
1,594 posts, read 1,420,793 times
Reputation: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
"Man is causing uncertain effects of uncertain quantities on climate"
So you are about 9 years out of date.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8RyNSzQDaU

The particulate matter and the CO2 are causing counteractive effects. We can't tell how incomplete the climate models are because there are still things we don't know about the system we are trying to model.

So we will most likely have totally screwed things up before the idiots admit there is a problem.

psik
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top