Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-07-2014, 02:15 PM
 
Location: South Bay
1,404 posts, read 1,031,720 times
Reputation: 525

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
infact less people have been added to public assistance than under the Previous President.
  • The economy continues to gain jobs, but the number of long-term unemployed is nearly double what it was when Obama became president.
  • Wages remain stagnant, increasing a scant 0.3 percent after inflation during Obama’s time. Meanwhile corporate profits are running 178 percent higher than just before he took office, and stock prices have doubled.
  • The number of low-income persons on food stamps remains just below the record level reached in 2012, with 15 percent of the population still getting benefits.
Obama’s Numbers (January 2014 Update)

Poverty: Any lingering doubts about the deficiencies of Obamanomics can be dispelled with one piece of data: The U.S. has spent $3.7 trillion on welfare in the past five years, with virtually nothing to show for it.

Means-tested aid programs now number about 80. Food stamps, with more than 47 million recipients, have gotten the lion's share of recent attention. But that's just one of 15 food-aid programs.

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editor...s-a-record.htm


How did you come to the conclusion that less people have been added?

The Census Department reported just this week that 49% of the population, or 151 million Americans, got federal aid from at least one program in 2011 — up from 94 million in 2000.

Clearly, you are wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2014, 02:56 PM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,277,139 times
Reputation: 28564
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
"Fifty-seven percent of Democrats say the country is better off today, down from 81 percent who felt that way in 2012."
They're delusional. I voted for Obama in '08 and '12 (lesser of two evils both times) and I think we are worse off now than we were in 2012, for SURE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2014, 03:58 PM
 
1,690 posts, read 2,060,161 times
Reputation: 993
We are better off now than 2012 based on the Dow jones industrial

We climbed more than 40%!!!!!!!

The January 2012 Thrift savings plan life cycle fund, the fund that allocated for those retiring in 2050,

A daily rebalanced portfolio containing

64% in Dow Jones, 15% in S&P 500, 10% in International stocks MSCI EAFE, the rest in Bonds

Was valued at $9.57/share in January 2012 and is now at $14.40/share

That means 40+%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top