Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Can you move WMD without leaving any trace? No you can't. There were no WMDs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
Indeed they are relevant. Rockefeller warned Iraq's allies and subsequently Clapper said Iraq's weapons were moved to Syria. Of course Blix couldn't find them. Iraq moved them to Syria.
Again, Clapper is Obama's Director of National Intelligence. Rockefeller is a Dem. Clinton warned of Iraq's WMDs before Bush did. What are you not getting about any of this?
Can you move WMD without leaving any trace? No you can't.
Clapper said he saw the caravans moving the illicit weapons to Syria on satellite images.
Are you sure you want to go with the position that Obama nominated a National Director of Intelligence (Clapper) who has absolutely no clue what he's doing?
It would be an immature understanding of geopolitics to believe that the U.S. led invasion of Iraq was about anything else other than oil.
War crimes? Sure, there were plenty of those (research The First Battle of Fallujah 2004) but those are inevitable anytime there's a major conflict. Even President Obama is finding out that there's no such thing as a clean war given the devastation and collateral damage that even drones leave behind.
Like I said, I found the documentary interesting but I'm not a partisan hack like many of the Sock Puppets on the forum.
Well, if you believe oil is money.
Used to be, time was money.
Course, no physicist has ever been able to prove it.
The fact is Cheney was going to find a reason to advance the agenda laid out by PNAC.
That's what I got from it. I remember reading the PNAC not long after 9/11 and was shocked by it. It was painfully obvious that in the runup to the war, the Bush asministration was just tossing out reasons to go to war, seeing which reason would "stick". There was no doubt that they were going to war, and there was no stopping it.
Now, where's all that money that was supposed to pay for this war?? Even stupid predictions that the Iraqi Dinar would return to its old value of over $3, making Americans rich. I think there were some ridiculous assumptions made that ended up ruining the U.S. financially.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
/sarcasm
