Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
so what?? If I was in Ryan's situation, I sure wouldn't be giving interviews willy nilly.... I prefer to stay as far away from media as possible
CCRC was quoted, I think, by the big-pharma-conspiracy guy.....
and all of you with your conspiracy theories.... I would LOVE to know why you think someone would execute such a hoax?? to what end and for what benefit?? and how did they get SOOOOOOO many people to participate without one single slipup??
If they did execute such a hoax, they indeed had many slipups; refer back to my original post and the questions I raised.
so what?? If I was in Ryan's situation, I sure wouldn't be giving interviews willy nilly.... I prefer to stay as far away from media as possible
Maybe you need to read the whole thread as my comment will probably make more sense to you within the context of that particular conversation.
Quote:
CCRC was quoted, I think, by the big-pharma-conspiracy guy.....
and all of you with your conspiracy theories.... I would LOVE to know why you think someone would execute such a hoax?? to what end and for what benefit?? and how did they get SOOOOOOO many people to participate without one single slipup??
I'm pretty sure I already offered my view as to the why's earlier in the thread. There were plenty of slip ups and lots of mistakes.
The official report most certainly does not lay to rest whether this was a real event or not. But if it makes you feel better to try to paint people with the ability to think critically as "tin foil hat wearers" then more power to ya.
Maybe you need to read the whole thread as my comment will probably make more sense to you within the context of that particular conversation.
I'm pretty sure I already offered my view as to the why's earlier in the thread. There were plenty of slip ups and lots of mistakes.
I have read the entire thread and am just shaking my head at the level of paranoia displayed...... it must be EXHAUSTING.......
and I have read about what you call slipups and the perfectly LOGICAL explanations......
what is not logical to me is who would benefit how by perpetuating such a hoax.... Oh, I saw your vague comments about "control," .... but control of what?? of whom?? for what? why??
Except that the autopsy report found no drugs in his system.
I'm not the one who insinuated that Adam Lanza must have been taking medications. That was another poster. If you read my comment you will clearly see that I said "there are problems with SSRI's and I think that they can be linked to increased aggression and suicide in past shootings". Because in many past shootings, the shooters were taking SSRI's. And since we know that one of the known side effects of SSRI's can be increased aggression and suicide. So to say that they could be linked to past shootings does not seem like a stretch.
I have read the entire thread and am just shaking my head at the level of paranoia displayed...... it must be EXHAUSTING.......
and I have read about what you call slipups and the perfectly LOGICAL explanations......
what is not logical to me is who would benefit how by perpetuating such a hoax.... Oh, I saw your vague comments about "control," .... but control of what?? of whom?? for what? why??
Anyone else sick of spiteful people turning every tragedy into a conspiracy theory?
Freckin' ghouls.
It's actually scary. I don't think of them as spiteful. I think of them as being "sick". And Adam Lanza was certainly a sick person. Food for thought..........
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.