Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:06 AM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,208,672 times
Reputation: 1640

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
My comments were based upon the OP's synopsis of
"it wasnt so bad"..

He never stated anything like that..

Some slaves stayed with their former owners after they were freed, and we still have left wing kooks all pretending they knew whats better for people hundreds of years later

I note you didnt address my question about people being stuck in poverty? Why not? Because it proves how asinine your replies are?
Brown said that slave owners were mostly good to their slaves

Do you agree with that statement, yes or no, simple question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:09 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,087,528 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Brown said that slave owners were mostly good to their slaves

Do you agree with that statement, yes or no, simple question.
Brown equates government spending to causing poverty, something you refuse to address.. You can pick out a few words of the statement and pretend its what he was talking about, but that would make you dishonest.

Treatment of them, depended on regions in which they lived.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:12 AM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,208,672 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Brown equates government spending to causing poverty, something you refuse to address.. You can pick out a few words of the statement and pretend its what he was talking about, but that would make you dishonest.

Treatment of them, depended on regions in which they lived.
Still refusing to answer the question with a straight answer.

I'm done with this thread, what's the point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:13 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,087,528 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Still refusing to answer the question with a straight answer.

I'm done with this thread, what's the point.
Whats wrong, you dont want someone pointing out how dishonest you are in not addressing his total point that government creates poverty and perpetuates it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Texas
872 posts, read 827,601 times
Reputation: 938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Brown said that slave owners were mostly good to their slaves

Do you agree with that statement, yes or no, simple question.
No, he said slave owners took pretty good care of their slaves. Read the posting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,713,615 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tassy001 View Post
Yea, he did not say it wasn't so bad....no where in his post does it say that.
He did however say" they took good care of their slaves and livestock".

Rather than offending, is it possible his intent was to appeal to a segment of the population that has similar perceptions? Or, is he just another politician, regardless of party, who can't think before posting or opening his mouth?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,713,615 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Whats wrong, you dont want someone pointing out how dishonest you are in not addressing his total point that government creates poverty and perpetuates it?
Despite the good old days of the 50's, about 20% of the population lived in dire poverty.
55+ years later, the numbers have barely changed, but the definition of poverty has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:24 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,087,528 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Despite the good old days of the 50's, about 20% of the population lived in dire poverty.
55+ years later, the numbers have barely changed, but the definition of poverty has.
yes, only now we're spending $1T a year to continue the cycle, have upwards of $100T in unfunded liabilities, and moving the goalpost of the middle class downward every single day..

Democratic success..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Vermont
9 posts, read 7,665 times
Reputation: 12
"took pretty good care of their slaves AND LIVESTOCK" ? Slaves WERE CONSIDERED livestock. "Were kept in slavery through LACK OF EDUCATION AND OPPORTUNITY"? No, kept in slavery with chains, whips, bloodhounds and fugitive slave laws.

Further, anti-poverty programs are not entitlements, and, according to at least some economists (Paul Krugman for example) have lowered to poverty rate. We all pay for entitlements like Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid through our taxes, which is why we are all entitles to their benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:37 AM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,883,552 times
Reputation: 2460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Brown said that slave owners were mostly good to their slaves

Do you agree with that statement, yes or no, simple question.

Historically many of the Plantations and farms were driven on slave labor. Indeed many of these owners viewed slaves as a valuable asset that made them money. many were treated very well except the few, bad owners.

Thank God this no longer is practiced in America!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top