Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:15 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
I'm sure hundreds of thousands if not millions of Muslims have been on this observation deck without being removed. So what?

The question is, when people have prayed while on the observation deck, is their particular religion a factor in deciding whether to eject them or not.
In this case I would assume so but I don't know for 100% sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:16 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,098,699 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
If I own private property and I don't like that you are wearing a spongebob T-shirt and I ask you to leave.....it's your problem because it's my private property and I can do whatever the fudge I want.

If you refuse, claiming that you can be on my private property no matter what then you'll be arrested for trespassing.

Now if my property is say.....a restaurant, you can of course picket it, give me bad reviews in yelp and get other spongebob fans to boycott me....all reasonable actions within your rights.
But if someone can show that you, as a restaurant owner, have a pattern of making black people wearing a Sponge Bob t-shirt leave but allow white people wearing a Sponge Bob t-shirts to stay, then you got yourself a big problem with the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:16 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
You seem to understand why a business would throw someone out for doing so. :shrug:
Yes, and I also understand why a business wouldnt.. Its YOU not comprehending the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:17 PM
 
78,368 posts, read 60,566,039 times
Reputation: 49646
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Why would anyone want to remove people when they are not harming anyone? Why are you unable to answer this question? We've covered whether or not they can or not many times over and yet you still have to fall back to the same tired argument.

We are passed it. If you are not able to move forward, whatever.
To answer your question....it's because there are a lot of uptight jerks in this world that give grief to most of the rest of us more tolerant and reasonable people.

Private enterprises face all kinds of frivolous suits and often turn to draconian and often stupid policies to protect themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:17 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
If I own private property and I don't like that you are wearing a spongebob T-shirt and I ask you to leave.....it's your problem because it's my private property and I can do whatever the fudge I want.
And I would question your sanity over being bothered by Spongebob. Again this goes back to the argument we have all already agreed to. You may have the right to throw someone out but I'm asking why? Why does Spongebob bother you?

Quote:
If you refuse, claiming that you can be on my private property no matter what then you'll be arrested for trespassing.

Now if my property is say.....a restaurant, you can of course picket it, give me bad reviews in yelp and get other spongebob fans to boycott me....all reasonable actions within your rights.

However, when you are on someone elses property....if they don't like what you are doing then yes....it IS your problem.
In the small picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:18 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
But if someone can show that you, as a restaurant owner, have a pattern of making black people wearing a Sponge Bob t-shirt leave but allow white people wearing a Sponge Bob t-shirts to stay, then you got yourself a big problem with the law.
But if someone can show that you allowed black families to stay, while only asking that one family to leave for whatever reason, you arent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:19 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
To answer your question....it's because there are a lot of uptight jerks in this world that give grief to most of the rest of us more tolerant and reasonable people.
And we should cater to the uptight jerks?

Quote:
Private enterprises face all kinds of frivolous suits and often turn to draconian and often stupid policies to protect themselves.
Seems to me that in this case they opened themselves up to them as opposed to trying to avoid one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:20 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Yes, and I also understand why a business wouldnt.. Its YOU not comprehending the difference.
I'm asking you to explain it to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:20 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,098,699 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
So clearly they arent being refused access because their muslim..

Now you're moving the goal post from just muslims to all religions.

I very well believe that people pray up there all the time, even muslims..

There is a reason THIS family was singled out..
I'm not moving the goal posts at all. That's the legal issue here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 12:21 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
And we should cater to the uptight jerks?

Seems to me that in this case they opened themselves up to them as opposed to trying to avoid one.
Arent you the one who suggested they should kick everyone else out who had a problem with it? Wouldnt that have created a similar reaction?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top