Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-23-2014, 02:22 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,727,707 times
Reputation: 13868

Advertisements

Obama has said repeatedly that “millionaires and billionaires” should pay more taxes. The effective tax cut for millionaires like those in the Obama White House highlights a contradiction in

Obama’s proposal to raise taxes only on individuals making more than $250,000 as opposed to the “millionaires and billionaires” mentioned in the president’s speeches. The proposal would penalize those Americans who are not millionaires but earn incomes above $250,000.

Obama raise taxes on millionaires and billionaires, raise taxes on income of $200k or more
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-23-2014, 02:25 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,727,707 times
Reputation: 13868
Warren Buffet’s suggestion and raise taxes on millionaires. Don’t go after the hard-working doctors, professors, and business owners who make $200,000+ a year. They aren’t the millionaires we refer to because the majority of them are likely not millionaires!

How Long Does It Take To Become A Millionaire? | Financial Samurai
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 02:30 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,727,707 times
Reputation: 13868
Obama has a new term for the people he wants to tax more: jet owners.

In his news conference today, the president said: “I think it’s only fair to ask an oil company or a corporate jet owner that’s doing so well to give up that tax break.

The problem is that most of the people that would be subject to the higher taxes the president wants aren’t likely to be private-jet owners. Someone earning $250,000 a year–among those scheduled for a tax increase in 2012–is unlikely to afford a jet–or even a few charter trips on a jet.

Note To Obama: $250,000-a-Year Earners Can’t Afford Jets
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 02:35 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,727,707 times
Reputation: 13868
Democrats were simply using all this "millionaire and billionaire" talk to disguise their true agenda, which is to raise taxes on families making as little as $250,000.

Boehner's "Plan B" would extend the Bush tax rates on everyone except those making $1 million or more. In fact, as soon as Boehner introduced his Plan B, Democrats started screeching about how raising taxes only on millionaires and billionaires wasn't nearly enough.

Speaker Boehner's Plan B Exposes Obama's Grade-A Tax-the-Rich Lie - Investors.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 02:43 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,727,707 times
Reputation: 13868
Mr Obama here are your millionaires and billionaires

However, many on the left decry capitalism as being ‘greedy’ and ‘money grubbing’ and almost every day you hear random Democrats talking about those evil ‘millionaires and billionaires’. Obama and all his cronies seem to despise ‘millionaires and billionaires’, I thought I’d give him a hand and rat out some of those uber-wealthy folks he seems to dislike so much.

Do you sheeple really believe they would do anything to hurt their own pockets?

Michael Bloomberg: Net worth, $18 billion

George Soros: Net worth, $14.2 billion

Oprah Winfrey: Net worth, $2.7 billion

Ted Turner: Net worth, $2.2 billion

Les Moonves, CEO CBS: Net worth, $300 million

John Kerry: Net worth, $210 million

Lady Gaga: Net worth, $110 million

Al Gore: Net worth, $100 million

Bill Clinton: Net worth, $80 million

John Edwards: Net worth, $55.5 million

Katie Couric: Net worth, $55 million

Michael Moore: Net worth, $50 million

Whoopi Goldberg: Net worth, $45 million

Nancy Pelosi: Net worth, $35 million

Arianna Huffington: Net worth, $35 million

Arlen Specter: Net worth, $30 million

Keith Olbermann: Net worth, $25 million

Bill Maher: Net worth, $23 million

Hillary Clinton: Net worth, $21.5 million

Rahm Emanuel: Net worth, $14 million

Eric Holder: Net worth, $11.5 million

Jesse Jackson: Net worth, $10 million

Janeane Garofalo: Net worth, $10 million

Al Franken: Net worth, $8 million

Joy Behar: Net worth, $8 million

Barack Hussein Obama: Net worth, $5 million

Al Sharpton: Net worth, $5 million

Gavin Newsom: Net worth, $5 million

Jerry Brown: Net worth, $4 million
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 02:48 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,727,707 times
Reputation: 13868
House of Representatives Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi has suggested that the income threshold for extending tax extensions be set at $1 million a year rather than the $250,000 limit Obama wants.

Some Democrats oppose any extension, while others are wary of allowing taxes to rise for higher earners because of the impact it could have on small businesses, an argument that Republicans have stressed repeatedly.

Barack Obama calls for extension of Bush-era tax cuts | GlobalPost
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 03:44 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,997 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13696
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
One pays for services. One of which is the government. We use a graduated scale that requires higher payments from those with more income.
That "graduated scale" is wildly out of proportion. Look at the difference in income groups' cost of government services received per dollar of taxes paid:



Sources of data in chart:
The Distribution of Tax and Spending Policies in the United States

The bottom 20% is getting 135.5 times the value in government services for their federal taxes paid than is the top 1%.


Note to moderators: all images appearing in this post have been linked via HTML text command in a legally permissible manner per the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Perfect 10 v. Amazon ruling, and as such do not constitute copyright violation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 03:47 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,997 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13696
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post

"The assumption that spending more of the taxpayer's money will make things better has survived all kinds of evidence that it has made things worse.

The black family which survived slavery, discrimination, poverty, wars and depressions began to come apart as the federal government moved in with its well-financed programs to "help"
--- Thomas Sowell
One of Sowell's best!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 03:51 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,997 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13696
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
Lets not bring the racial card into this shall we?

Or has this been the real reason behind the OP all along?
Why ignore the very real damage the welfare state has done to Black families like the 72% unwed birth rate, etc.

Feeling a little guilty because the damage is being noted and publicized by a Black man?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2014, 04:00 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,220,937 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Credited: Philo_Beddoe a very good question from Thomas Sowell.

“I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
--- Thomas Sowell
great quote
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top