Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sigh. You clearly do not understand how a scientific experiment is supposed to be conducted or the lingo. Just to address a couple of them:
A past experiment can not be used as a control in a current experiment, it is a subject has all the same variables that might influence the outcome with the exception of the independent variable.
For an experiment to be reliable, it must produce similar results every time the treatment is done, for an experiment to be valid, it must actually test what it claims it is testing, and repeatable means another experimenter using the exact same methods with be able to produce the same overcomes and it must be disprovable.
Killing someone because you think they are better off dead or that it will improve society as a whole is not always considered 1st degree murder, so you are having issues with your definitions
If the experiment is not ethical, among other things defined as not causing harm, whether physical, emotional, or psychological, to any and all participants, the research is not ethical. Clearly, participants will be harmed in this experiment.
Outrage is a difficult variable to quantify or qualify.
Does this whole project seem a little too much for a 4th grader to actually grasp realistically?
This might follow under at least a high school cultural studies class and at most a college philosphy question on a test
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.