President obama gave us choice to accept gays in military or resign (Congress, interview)

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by All American NYC

So Obama threatens our men of honor.

Ever worn green? There's this highly technical military term known as an "order".

Or, in the immortal words of Col. Potter of the 4077th: "When you're wearing a green tuxedo, you dance where they tell you."

Takes a writer for deadlyingguy.com to get worked up over that.

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by btsilver

sooooooooooooo which one is it?

Whichever makes the President looks the worst, duh. Interesting to see how the winds are changing, though, isn't it?

[katzpaw]

Adm. Robert Rapp said that in 2010 Obama told U.S. military leaders to accept his push for gays in the military,

Nice spin but it's not a push for gays in the military. It's acceptance of gays in the military.

[EmeraldCityWanderer]

Originally Posted by T-310

And replace it with liberal/socialist democrats? (LSD)

Watch what happens in November.

Nothing, Obama isn't stepping down in November after serving his term.

Some people's ingorance of the democratic process is astounding.

[alexcanter]

Heres what I just can't understand with this stuff,

Why is this an issue in other words, how is it the guy's need to know if someone is gay, shouldn't that be personal information,

If its not personal information , a preference as its put concerning a mating connection which is personal

( evidence- if a guy fancy's blondes its his personal choice to tell the guys , right?) ,

then how can it not be anything but a come on to the hetro guy's ?

If above is in order it shouldn't even be a known but if it is,

where is the value in the issue at all, but for the come on ?

[djacques]

Originally Posted by All American NYC

So Obama threatens our men of honor.

Yeah, who does he think he is, their boss? Oh yeah...

[McBain II]

Good.

Anyone see a problem with this?

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by alexcanter

Heres what I just can't understand with this stuff,

Why is this an issue in other words, how is it the guy's need to know if someone is gay, shouldn't that be personal information,

If its not personal information , a preference as its put concerning a mating connection which is personal( evidence- if a guy fancy's blondes its his personal choice to tell the guys , right?)

And if anyone was forcibly removed from the military for saying he liked blondes - or by saying he went on a date with a blonde - or by having a photo of a blonde in his locker - then you might have had a point.

then how can it not be anything but a come on to the hetro guy's ?

If true it shouldn't even be a known but if it is,

where is the value but for the come on ?

An honest answer to "What did you do over the week-end?" ("Went on a date with my girlfriend/boyfriend") could be a career-ending event until DADT was abolished. That's no way to treat people.

[alexcanter]

The whole thing is discrete and cunning trickery in order to not accept but flourish the anti science 'suggestion' of a mating connection.

[T-310]

Originally Posted by EmeraldCityWanderer

Nothing, Obama isn't stepping down in November after serving his term.

Some people's ingorance of the democratic process is astounding.

So you ignore the midterms?

You think there is partisan politics now, wait until the Senate swings right with the House.

Your idiot hero in the WH will be figuratively emasculated.