Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You've posted that same propaganda link a dozen times.....Good grief....How childish can you get?
Typical response from the believer crowd--
Translation: It doesn't conform to my preconceived, inflexible opinion on the matter, therefore it must be propaganda.
The 97% figure that you sheep keep regurgitating like it's the gospel came from a paper cited in that link. They emailed a sample of the scientists who were part of the so called 97% and the results were most of them felt misrepresented into being classified as endorsing AGW!
Pretty damning evidence I'd say. You can't SPIN that. These same climate scientists who you respect so highly when they are supposedly part of this false consensus are saying in their own words that they are being misrepresented. So now what? Where they all paid off by big oil?
You insult the intelligence of skeptics for being gullible yet you blindly accept it as the gospel truth when the media tells you there is a 97% consensus
Typical response from the believer crowd--
Translation: It doesn't conform to my preconceived, inflexible opinion on the matter, therefore it must be propaganda.
The 97% figure that you sheep keep regurgitating like it's the gospel came from a paper cited in that link. They emailed a sample of the scientists who were part of the so called 97% and the results were most of them felt misrepresented into being classified as endorsing AGW!
Pretty damning evidence I'd say. You can't SPIN that. These same climate scientists who you respect so highly when they are supposedly part of this false consensus are saying in their own words that they are being misrepresented. So now what? Where they all paid off by big oil?
You insult the intelligence of skeptics for being gullible yet you blindly accept it as the gospel truth when the media tells you there is a 97% consensus
Urefereed article with a known crank's name attached to it. Science, please. Not the garbage your right-wing friends send you. Another right-wing fail.
Nah.. it just contains the very climate scientists who were part of the so called consensus openly admitting in their own words that they were being misrepresented into supporting AGW.
Nothing to see here, move along folks, it must be right wing propaganda
Thanks for sharing it. Pretty staggering to those with an open mind. Pretty funny to watch the PRETZEL SHAPES that people will bend themselves into to dismiss it if it doesn't fit their beliefs.
Thanks for sharing it. Pretty staggering to those with an open mind. Pretty funny to watch the PRETZEL SHAPES that people will bend themselves into to dismiss it if it doesn't fit their beliefs.
couldn't rep you again. Yes it is amusing to watch that's for sure.
Typical response from the believer crowd--
Translation: It doesn't conform to my preconceived, inflexible opinion on the matter, therefore it must be propaganda.
The 97% figure that you sheep keep regurgitating like it's the gospel came from a paper cited in that link. They emailed a sample of the scientists who were part of the so called 97% and the results were most of them felt misrepresented into being classified as endorsing AGW!
Pretty damning evidence I'd say. You can't SPIN that. These same climate scientists who you respect so highly when they are supposedly part of this false consensus are saying in their own words that they are being misrepresented. So now what? Where they all paid off by big oil?
You insult the intelligence of skeptics for being gullible yet you blindly accept it as the gospel truth when the media tells you there is a 97% consensus
I pay no attention to the media, as I read the peer reviewed papers published in scientific journals....I have proven that that page is utter garbage....Use the handy dandy search feature to find my rebuttal.
I pay no attention to the media, as I read the peer reviewed papers published in scientific journals....I have proven that that page is utter garbage....Use the handy dandy search feature to find my rebuttal.
Yeah? How about the scientists who publish peer reviewed papers in scientific journals being quoted that they are being misrepresented as part of this false consensus?
Typical response from the believer crowd--
Translation: It doesn't conform to my preconceived, inflexible opinion on the matter, therefore it must be propaganda.
That wasn't my response. My response was it was an unrefereed article by a known crank. It has no more scientific credibility than a post from any random denialist. And I hear another author is a dowser.
Quote:
The 97% figure that you sheep keep regurgitating like it's the gospel came from a paper cited in that link. They emailed a sample of the scientists who were part of the so called 97% and the results were most of them felt misrepresented into being classified as endorsing AGW!
Pretty damning evidence I'd say.
Oh. Worthless garbage spewed by cranks I'd say.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.