Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2014, 03:48 PM
 
Location: west mich
5,739 posts, read 6,929,158 times
Reputation: 2130

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
lmao..The DoJ...What a laugh.
You want the DOJ indicting Cheney and Bush for war crimes? You want them to "do their job" on all fronts - including Wall Street banker-mobsters?
Congressional repubs certainly don't, and most right-wingers don't either - since they never complain about these sacred cows in this forum or anywhere else.

Last edited by detwahDJ; 04-09-2014 at 04:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2014, 05:03 PM
 
41,815 posts, read 51,008,283 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ View Post


Since you hold Clinton's sex-play more important....
Bill Clinton's misdeed wasn't getting a little on the side, it was perjury.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2014, 05:52 PM
 
Location: west mich
5,739 posts, read 6,929,158 times
Reputation: 2130
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Bill Clinton's misdeed wasn't getting a little on the side, it was perjury.
He was pursued by the likes of the adulterer Newt Gingrich, who was boinking a woman other than his wife throughout the process, exactly for the purpose of exposing Clinton's brief sexual foreplay "infidelity" as a public media smear, and they got an impeachment due to Gingrich's supportive and sleazy repub allies. Of course, to righties this is much more important than lying Americans into a war.
Since hypocrisy is not a sin to conservatives, it appears that the mentality is essentially a morally bankrupt and criminal one. These "christian" conservatives are quite the spectacle.

So Coal Guy, you think churches who preach political viewpoints should lose their tax exemption?

Last edited by detwahDJ; 04-09-2014 at 06:17 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2014, 05:56 PM
 
41,815 posts, read 51,008,283 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ View Post
He was pursued by the likes of the adulterer Newt Gingrich, who was boinking another woman other than his wife throughout the process, exactly for exposing Clinton's brief sexual foreplay "infidelity" hoping for a public media smear, and they got an impeachment due to Gingrich's supportive and sleazy repub allies.
Since hypocrisy is not a sin to conservatives, it appears that the mentality is essentially a morally bankrupt and criminal one. These "christian" conservatives are quite the spectacle.
Blah, blah, blah.... The bottom line is he committed perjury.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2014, 06:16 PM
 
Location: DFW
2,956 posts, read 3,525,953 times
Reputation: 1829
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Ummmmmm...Of course anyone with a brain knew this....



Does this surprise anyone? I'd love to see Lois Lerner and Elijah Cummings get "24 style" interrogations. This Democrat moron (Cummings) participated in illegal political suppression using the IRS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2014, 09:18 PM
 
Location: west mich
5,739 posts, read 6,929,158 times
Reputation: 2130
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Blah, blah, blah.... The bottom line is he committed perjury.
Yep, congratulations! You got your impeachment. Your heroes Newt Gingrich and Tom DeLay got their extramarital affairs. What a country, and what great "family values" Christians.

What do you think about preaching politics from the pulpit with a taxpayer exemption? Okay with you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2014, 10:19 PM
 
41,815 posts, read 51,008,283 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ View Post
What do you think about preaching politics from the pulpit with a taxpayer exemption? Okay with you?
Like any tax exempt organization a church can advocate on issues, if you are going to remove the tax exempt status of churches you have to remove it for all organizations because nearly everyone of them has a political agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2014, 10:23 PM
 
41,111 posts, read 25,710,838 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ View Post
Yep, congratulations! You got your impeachment. Your heroes Newt Gingrich and Tom DeLay got their extramarital affairs. What a country, and what great "family values" Christians.

What do you think about preaching politics from the pulpit with a taxpayer exemption? Okay with you?
I had to laugh today. Standing in line I saw the magazine rack and there one that said "Impeach Obama"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 06:15 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,866 posts, read 46,581,607 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ View Post


What do you think about preaching politics from the pulpit with a taxpayer exemption? Okay with you?

There is an amendment that keeps government out of GOD's business.
There is no amendment to the US Constitution that keeps GOD out of governments business.

It is freedom of religion. Not freedom from religion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 06:36 AM
 
58,936 posts, read 27,247,795 times
Reputation: 14250
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ View Post
How many times must you be told that the approval on all sides was the result of phony trumped-up "intelligence" fabricated by cheney/Bush as an excuse to invade, even after inspectors told them there were no WMDs?
How many times must you be apprised of the fact that Cheney met with oil barons long before the invasion in order to divide up oil profits?
This all escape your right-wing "memory"?
Yeah, dems and the public supported the war because they trusted those repub liars who need to be in prison for what they did. They exploited the integrity of Colin Powell to convey their "message" to Americans. This is hate you say? Yeah, I hate them.
I'm glad you support that second point, but what to the "dems" have to do with preaching from a tax-exempt church? What is your point here?
You might want to look, their may be a black helicopter hoovering over your head!.

"in order to divide up oil profits?' Prove it.

"dems and the public supported the war because they trusted those repub liars"

Do you mean these "repubs" liars?

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Those poor, poor democrats. Too stupid to figure out for themselves that not only were they WRONG when they were in power, they were STILL WRONG in 2003! After they didn't vote for the war that they voted for!


So tell me, who did you vote for in the last 2 elections?

I'd bet it was for Obama and BIDEN. Biden, you know, the Senator who voted FOR the actions in Iraq.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top