Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The world revolves around the sun? Does the Earth also spin on its axis? Do you mean we are not god's chosen creatures at the center of the universe? Who'd have thunk it? Musta been some atheist Liberal.
Global warmers are the new flat earthers so they think the sun revolves around THEM.
Its only a matter of time until the far left goes back to human sacrifice. Maybe they already have.
Global warmers are the new flat earthers so they think the sun revolves around THEM.
Its only a matter of time until the far left goes back to human sacrifice. Maybe they already have.
Perhaps- cults do strange things.
True science embraces further study and examination of a theory or premise. In the cult of global warming, any questioning of this "theory" is derided and villified. Those questioning the validity of this completely unsubstantiated theory are labeled "flat earthers" or "deniers"!
Has there EVER been another theory, whose proponants ridicule and condemn those who do not share thier views? YES!
1. theory of gravity opponants
2. those who opposed the concept that the earth revolved around the sun
3. those who opposed the concept of vapors and humors in the process of disease
4. those who opposed the use of leaches in treatment of disease
5. those who opposed the veracity of witches
6. those who opposed the concept that there were only sea monsters and water beyond the "old world"
7. those who opposed the belief that the soul and thought lied in the liver
8. those who opposed the notion that stars were dead souls from earth
You see.............................. modern science was supposed to have helped dispel silly notions and apply a systematic analysis to a theory to determine whether it was valid- or not. Now we have "global warming" cult members turning the concept of science upside down and embracing a tenuous, unproven theory as the gospel truth, despite no conclusive evidence. The cornerstone of science- REFUTING THE NULL HYPOTHESIS- has been thrown out the window.
Yet the 49% who know that the earth revolves around the sun also believe in the certainty of man-made "global warming", thus negating their mastery of the obvious.
When you hear what liberals think, it is easier to understand why they are liberals.
Understanding liberals gives me a migraine. Their convoluted thinking is difficult to decipher. Support free speech but try to stifle any dissent to their talking points.
51% of Democrats do not know that the Earth goes around the Sun, once a year!
That percentage cannot be correct. No one asked me, and I think it would be very time-consuming to ask every single Democrat if the Earth goes around the Sun.
Global warmers are the new flat earthers so they think the sun revolves around THEM.
Its only a matter of time until the far left goes back to human sacrifice. Maybe they already have.
It's interesting because, in the face of actual evidence that Democrats are ignorant, this guy masterfully manages to ignore that and clumsily post a random talking point. He totally convinced us all that Democrats are brilliant!!
51% of Democrats do not know that the Earth goes around the Sun, once a year!
That percentage cannot be correct. No one asked me, and I think it would be very time-consuming to ask every single Democrat if the Earth goes around the Sun.
So much BS, too bad I can't use any in my garden!
I'm going to use that rebuttal for every study that is ever conducted in the future. Think it's going to work? Wish me luck!
51% of Democrats do not know that the Earth goes around the Sun, once a year!
That percentage cannot be correct. No one asked me, and I think it would be very time-consuming to ask every single Democrat if the Earth goes around the Sun.
So much BS, too bad I can't use any in my garden!
Seeing that the poll doesn't state its margin of error leads me to believe this was a poorly conducted poll.
Seeing that the poll doesn't state its margin of error leads me to believe this was a poorly conducted poll.
Huh, so if there's no margin of error reported in an article, then it is a poorly conducted study? That's an amazing conclusion. It's almost like you're desperately looking for an excuse.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
