Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The best way to show you have no interest in reasonable civil disobedience is to show up with a gun. Imagine if the Occupy Wall St protesters did the same, guns were not necessary. These so called protestors wanted a fight and were there to provoke
All for a guy who refuses to pay his bills and to recognize property ownership. What a bunch of nut-balls.
I am just curious. What exactly warrants that the federal government even charge for
cattle to graze there? What have they done to the land that would warrant it, except
wanting someone to pay their bogus salaries.
And eminent domain comes to mind when you bring up recognizing property ownership.
Just because they have the power to do so, does not mean it is always right.
Why does the gov own 80 percent of NV anyway. If I was a Nevadian, I'd be pissed.
Right, I can just see just see the Occupy Wall Street protestors with AR-15's. These people should have used some common sense if they wanted to protest.
I am just curious. What exactly warrants that the federal government even charge for
cattle to graze there? What have they done to the land that would warrant it, except
wanting someone to pay their bogus salaries.
Right, I can just see just see the Occupy Wall Street protestors with AR-15's. These people should have used some common sense if they wanted to protest.
Maybe they would have accomplished more? Maybe they wouldn't have been ran off from places they had every right to be. Maybe someone would have listened to their complaints. Maybe they will learn a lesson here.
“In accordance with the rule of law, we must use the system set forth in our
Constitution to change those laws and regulations. Nevada Cattlemen’s
Association does not condone actions that are outside the law in which
citizens take the law into their own hands,” the group’s statement
reads.
The Nevada Cattlemen’s Association is a nonprofit trade association that was
established in 1935. The group has 567 dues-paying members who convene
annually to “review, renew and create policy for our organization,”
according to Torell. He said Bundy is not a member of the association, which
consists of cattle and sheep ranchers who hold grazing permits and pay fees
for grazing privileges on public, federal lands.
I am just curious. What exactly warrants that the federal government even charge for cattle to graze there? What have they done to the land that would warrant it, except
wanting someone to pay their bogus salaries.
Ask Bundy. He had no problem paying the fees until 1993.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin
And eminent domain comes to mind when you bring up recognizing property ownership.
Just because they have the power to do so, does not mean it is always right.
This is in no way the same thing as eminent domain. The land was never Bundy's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin
Why does the gov own 80 percent of NV anyway. If I was a Nevadian, I'd be pissed.
They have only their Nevadian ancestors to blame.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
