Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2007, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Arizona
5,407 posts, read 7,793,866 times
Reputation: 1198

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
Irrelevant speculation with a proviso as big as all outdoors "...without the go-ahead from the South Korean government...").

You like Kim the movie star, bily4? Wouldn't want to see a regime change there?

What on earth makes you think the Bush administration would ask for any "go-ahead" from South Korea?

Obviously the Koreans feel it is a legitimate scenario or they wouldn't bother asking the question. If you have been to South Korea any time recently, there is a pretty prevalent anti-American sentiment there.

Sure if Kim leaves that would be nice for his own people. I wish them all the best. Or are you asking... should the United States precipitate that in some way? I personally think that would be a bit rash and ill advised, especially in lieu of our current military being stretched as it is. I think trying to maintain constructive dialogue with North Korea and regional leaders is a very nice idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2007, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,326,022 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by bily4 View Post
What on earth makes you think the Bush administration would ask for any "go-ahead" from South Korea?

Common sense.

Obviously the Koreans feel it is a legitimate scenario or they wouldn't bother asking the question. If you have been to South Korea any time recently, there is a pretty prevalent anti-American sentiment there.

I've been to Korea many times. The current President foolishly ran on a platform of anti-Americanism, and that hasn't helped. Many of the more prosperous young people ARE punks. But many come here to study....

Sure if Kim leaves that would be nice for his own people. I wish them all the best. Or are you asking... should the United States precipitate that in some way? I personally think that would be a bit rash and ill advised, especially in lieu of our current military being stretched as it is. I think trying to maintain constructive dialogue with North Korea and regional leaders is a very nice idea.
A constructive dialogue with North Korea, the Hermit Kingdom. What a novel idea. Let us know when that looks likely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2007, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Arizona
5,407 posts, read 7,793,866 times
Reputation: 1198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
A constructive dialogue with North Korea, the Hermit Kingdom. What a novel idea. Let us know when that looks likely.
Then what are you suggesting be done to save the North Koreans from "eating roots and doing cartwheels"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2007, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Your mind
2,935 posts, read 4,999,209 times
Reputation: 604
Quote:
You like Kim the movie star, bily4? Wouldn't want to see a regime change there?
Like the war boosters on Fox back in '02-'03, "You don't want to see regime change in Iraq? You love Saddam? You think he's just great, don't you, and you probably wish George W. could be just like him cause you hate America so much, you Baathist sympathizer, Jane Fonda would be proud of you libs, even your lib idol Hillary Clinton is going for it, what does that say about you, you pacifist Chamberlain appeaser?"

In the end, the boosters turned out to be totally right, as Iraq was liberated from Saddam, who possessed massive stocks of nuclear and chemical weapons stashed throughout his palace in every corner, and the Iraqis were blessed with an effective and competent democracy of civic-minded, non-sectarian representatives who quickly brought peace, electricity, and running water throughout the land and endeavored to travel on Diplomatic Democracy missions to bring human rights and prosperity to Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia, with minimal casualties throughout the whole affair, as should be obvious to anyone who reads the Weekly Standard or Commentary, aka "the real news."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2007, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,326,022 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishmonger View Post
Like the war boosters on Fox back in '02-'03, "You don't want to see regime change in Iraq? You love Saddam? You think he's just great, don't you, and you probably wish George W. could be just like him cause you hate America so much, you Baathist sympathizer, Jane Fonda would be proud of you libs, even your lib idol Hillary Clinton is going for it, what does that say about you, you pacifist Chamberlain appeaser?"
Nobody's boosting a war.

Besides -- Saddam, Kim. Different people.

Like fish and bily4, I hope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2007, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,326,022 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by bily4 View Post
Then what are you suggesting be done to save the North Koreans from "eating roots and doing cartwheels"?
Got me.

Go over to the Election subforum. I'm sure Ron Paul has thought about this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2007, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Your mind
2,935 posts, read 4,999,209 times
Reputation: 604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
Nobody's boosting a war.

Besides -- Saddam, Kim. Different people.

Like fish and bily4, I hope.
But you seem to be suggesting that a "regime change" war in Korea would be a good idea, and that bily4 is a Kim Jong Il sympathizer for not thinking so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2007, 02:46 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,326,022 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishmonger View Post
But you seem to be suggesting that a "regime change" war in Korea would be a good idea, and that bily4 is a Kim Jong Il sympathizer for not thinking so.
I think a regime change (no quotes) in North Korea would be a good idea, yes. Don't you?

And I asked bily4 if he liked Kim Jong Il. A question is not a suggestion.

I think you're just bored.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2007, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Your mind
2,935 posts, read 4,999,209 times
Reputation: 604
I think it would be a great idea, as long as we don't violently initiate it and as long as what comes after is significantly better than what was there before. If there's some kind of popular pro-democracy uprising then good for them, but if we go in and try to tear down what's there and give them one, we could easily subject them to another indefinitely long Iraq-style counterinsurgency war, with a likely matchup of "America vs. the general North Korean population."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2007, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,326,022 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishmonger View Post
I think it would be a great idea, as long as we don't violently initiate it and as long as what comes after is significantly better than what was there before. If there's some kind of popular pro-democracy uprising then good for them, but if we go in and try to tear down what's there and give them one, we could easily subject them to another indefinitely long Iraq-style counterinsurgency war, with a likely matchup of "America vs. the general North Korean population."
It's hard to say. It's been so long since the North Koreans have had access to the outside world that they may very well be in the throes of a collective social psychosis. The experience of the Germans in trying to rehabilitate the "Osties" was very tough for a while. It is only lately that the hard feelings are fading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top