Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You do realize a man and woman don't have to love each other to get married. Also what is a sexual union? Is that another phrase for having sex?
Lol, sexual union is the god-sanctioned way of having sex: Missionary style, in the dark, through a hole in the sheet, and only for the purpose of trying to make a baby. Just like they did in the Garden of Eden.
You are heartless and mean for not allowing two loving gay women become married, that is the line over and over. They are not fighting for nor would they be satisfied with legal documents so they can share property.
That may be the line, but it's not the legal argument. And a legal marriage is more than just "sharing property." Taxes, visitation, medical decisions, custody, legal liability... it's a very extensive list.
It seems that you are hung up on sharing the word "marriage" with partnerships that you personally don't approve of. Fine, change the state laws and call everyone's marriage a civil union, or whatever instead of having the same word used for both civil contracts and sacred ceremonies.
Gay people birthing kids feels like they are cheating to me...
I have no problem with gays adopting... who wouldn't want to be adopted? But birthing a kid? You need sperm and if you are truly gay sperm is the "devils juice" so to speak.
Gay people birthing kids feels like they are cheating to me...
I have no problem with gays adopting... who wouldn't want to be adopted? But birthing a kid? You need sperm and if you are truly gay sperm is the "devils juice" so to speak.
What? So if a straight couple need a sperms donor to have a baby, that would be considered "devils juice?"
I don't know man, I just can't get too worked up over this stuff. The only time I'm worried about sex is if and when Mrs. Applcr0331 is giving me some. That's about where it should stop.
What? So if a straight couple need a sperms donor to have a baby, that would be considered "devils juice?"
I know it sounds crazy....lol
A straight couple trying to have a kid is natural... it's how kids are produced. I don't have a problem or see the confusion with getting sperm donated if they run into problems...
HOWEVER...
If you are truly gay I can't see how having kids is part of the equation.
A straight couple trying to have a kid is natural... it's how kids are produced. I don't have a problem or see the confusion with getting sperm donated if they run into problems...
HOWEVER...
If you are truly gay I can't see how having kids is part of the equation.
I'm not saying I'm right...lol. Just confused
Why are you confused?
The desire to have kids is independent of one's sexuality. It's either there, or it's not.
I know quite a few gay men who have had biological children through surrogates. Lesbians have it easier/cheaper since they just need the sperm and not the oven and eggs.
A straight couple trying to have a kid is natural... it's how kids are produced. I don't have a problem or see the confusion with getting sperm donated if they run into problems...
HOWEVER...
If you are truly gay I can't see how having kids is part of the equation.
I'm not saying I'm right...lol. Just confused
You sound like you need to sit down with someone who is gay so they can best explain this too you because it sounds like you have some misconceptions with gays.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.