Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is a horrible thing to do to any child. How would you like to grow up not knowing who your father was, and worse, knowing that you are simply a product of a "sperm donor?" No family history, no knowledge of who you are?
51% of heterosexuals can't bother to have their kids in wedlock and maintain an intact family, and y'all are worried about one lesbian family that has too many parents.
So what's the deal? Are people who feel hatred against homosexuals supposed to be against the homosexuals in the story linked and the situation they're sitting up?
Well lets start by clearing up the notion that because you believe in the definition of marriage being the historical religious union between one man and one woman, it does not mean that you automatically "hate homosexuals".
As to the story and my pointing out that AJ Scalia correctly predicted that legally all sorts of future definitions of marriage would occur based on the SCOTUS ruling, I am not sure what you are asking of me. My statement was a factual observation.
Now if you are asking me if I approve of the government sanctioning all sorts of alternate lifestyles and calling it marriage, then the answer is no.
However my broader point is that many times people point out that action X will result in unwanted consequences people would not approve of, yet they are dismissed because people want instant gratification, and the resulting chaos be damned. So it takes those with courage to stand against the current tide and make sure people see the negative consequences todays actions will result in tomorrow.
51% of heterosexuals can't bother to have their kids in wedlock and maintain an intact family, and y'all are worried about one lesbian family that has too many parents.
Ok.
Homosexuals are getting divorces in the 25% range... in time it will be just as high as hetero's.
Slightly off topic but I know a few females who claim homosexual or "bi" because men dogged them out and most of them end up with women who have the same characteristics as the guys they dated.
It's a sick mind that thinks "gay adoption" is okay, too. Worse, what this "couple" (er "threesome") has done! A child needs to know a mother and a father. Not two mothers, or three (or more). This child will have problems it's entire life.
"I asked the audience: “Enough of gays saying they feel offended all the time. How do they think I feel when they tell me, someone raised by lesbians, I don’t have a right to my father, because of experts and their supposed research?” Applause, applause. The clock struck 10:00 PM in Italy.
“They don’t want to be told whom to love. So who are they to tell children who aren’t theirs that they have to love two gay adults and can’t love a biological parent the adults cut out of their lives?”
This is a completely false statement from someone who clearly has no idea what they are talking about. A child being raised in a loving family is the only thing that matters.
Homosexuals are getting divorces in the 25% range... in time it will be just as high as hetero's.
Slightly off topic but I know a few females who claim homosexual or "bi" because men dogged them out and most of them end up with women who have the same characteristics as the guys they dated.
So do I. Those are crazy people. And it is 100% off topic.
A crazy person can claim to be a tyrannosaurus rex. Doesn't mean he is one or I should judge all TRex based on his example.
And you missed my point. Heteros have hardly set the shining example of good parenting. This is also way off topic, but I have LOTS of friends who have intact hetero marriages for their parents and one or both of their parents is a raging ahole or crazy person. That doesn't mean all heteros are crazy people aholes.
51% of heterosexuals can't bother to have their kids in wedlock and maintain an intact family, and y'all are worried about one lesbian family that has too many parents.
So who didn't think this would happen once the meaning of marriage was changed?
The meaning of marriage changed in 1975
No fault divorce
New definition of
Marriage
It is now a platform from which a law suit is launched 24 months after contract ---effectively stripping the man of half his livelihood for life
Without due process or wrong doing
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
