Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2014, 10:45 PM
 
32,068 posts, read 15,058,461 times
Reputation: 13684

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
Yeah that would not be. Why? because they would understand that there is not "our" abuse of a right, just a few people who`s actions should be punished and not the vast majority of people punished for their crimes by losing our rights..

Yeah dates change, human nature, liberty, and our right to it does not change.

It should be written the right to keep and bear arms should not be infringed, any laws that are drafted or passed that do are null and void, and any person who voted in favor of said act and or law should be kicked for office and bared from hold office for life.

We abuse that right though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2014, 10:48 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,740,791 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
We abuse that right though.
We do nothing, there is no we, just individuals who use their rights to infringe on the natural liberty of others.

Further owning a stranded magazines, sound suppressors, AR15`s is not abuse of a right it is the exercise of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 10:53 PM
 
32,068 posts, read 15,058,461 times
Reputation: 13684
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
We do nothing, there is no we, just individuals who use their rights to infringe on the natural liberty of others.

Further owning a stranded magazines, sound suppressors, AR15`s is not abuse of a right it is the exercise of it.


There would never have been a 2nd amendment if they knew the consequences in the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 10:56 PM
 
1,070 posts, read 739,573 times
Reputation: 144
How could they? They haven't seen a democratic society as there was none at the time and Ancient Greece was two millenniums apart. They didn't know any better.


Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
[/b]

There would never have been a 2nd amendment if they knew the consequences in the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 11:04 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,740,791 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
[/b]

There would never have been a 2nd amendment if they knew the consequences in the future.
They knew that people would abuse their rights, and they knew those who seek power would use those people and their actions as a excuse to strip the whole body of the people of their rights.

They would also that thvies would still steal, rapist would still rape, murders would still murder and tyrants and their armies would take by force and the threat of it..


They knew such things would happen because they understood that human nature and the nature of government never changes.

Quit with your defeatist views.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 11:05 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,895,086 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
[/b]

There would never have been a 2nd amendment if they knew the consequences in the future.
And that has anything to do with our right to keep and bear arms in the 21st century, how?

Maybe they wouldn't have ratified the 2A if they had known the future. That has nothing to do with our 2A rights today...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 11:16 PM
 
1,070 posts, read 739,573 times
Reputation: 144
Again, for my educationally challenged interlocutors here: the governments our Founding Fathers knew and feared were absolutist, conservative monarchies of the time, where royal subjects were not governed but ruled by their monarchs and had little or no say over any laws or policies enacted by their kings. This is what our Founding Fathers meant when they voiced their concerns about governmental tyranny. That's what they knew first hand having lived all their lives under British Crow and it's tyranny.

Obviously, this has little bearing on democratically elected governments which the citizens can always change through democratic elections or an impeachment process that is available. There is no need for revolts or resistance as there is a democratic process to address any grievances. There is no ruthless and tyrannical king, there is only a democratically elected president, democratically elected congressmen and appointed Supreme Court judges. There are no dynasties. Vote for someone that you like and be happy. And if you don't like our system then move somewhere else.






Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
They knew that people would abuse their rights, and they knew those who seek power would use those people and their actions as a excuse to strip the whole body of the people of their rights.

They would also that thvies would still steal, rapist would still rape, murders would still murder and tyrants and their armies would take by force and the threat of it..


They knew such things would happen because they understood that human nature and the nature of government never changes.

Quit with your defeatist views.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 11:17 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,740,791 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapaport View Post
How could they? They haven't seen a democratic society as there was none at the time and Ancient Greece was two millenniums apart. They didn't know any better.
They did know better, they made us a Republic based on set upon a Constitution.

By the way.

So disarming and murdering Mormons was not a tyrannical act because it was a law or rule that "society" has agreed upon?

What about the Holocaust?

Or the great lap forward?

Or the purges in the Soviet Union?

Where they not acts of tyranny?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 11:21 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,740,791 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapaport View Post
Again, for my educationally challenged interlocutors here: the governments our Founding Fathers new were absolutist, conservative monarchies, were royal subjects had little say over any laws or policies introduced by their kings. This is what they meant when they voiced their concerns about governmental tyranny. Obviously, this has little bearing on democratically elected governments which the citizens can always change through election or an impeachment process that is available. There is no need for revolts or resistance as there is a democratic process to address any grievances. There is no ruthless and tyrannical king, there is only a democratically elected president, democratically elected congressmen and appointed Supreme Court judges. There are no dynasties, vote for someone that you like and be happy. And if you don't like our system then move somewhere else.
The fact that you think that our system could never lead to tyranny or in its current form become tyrannical is just dumbfounding.

But then again coming from a man who does not think murdering Mormons is ok because a law says it is ok would have such views..

No I like this nation, its Constitution, its values, its culture, and its people.

If you want statism move back to Europe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 11:23 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,895,086 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapaport View Post
Again, for my educationally challenged interlocutors here: the governments our Founding Fathers knew and feared were absolutist, conservative monarchies of the time, where royal subjects were not governed but ruled by their monarchs and had little or no say over any laws or policies enacted by their kings. This is what our Founding Fathers meant when they voiced their concerns about governmental tyranny. That's what they knew first hand having lived all their lives under British Crow and it's tyranny.

Obviously, this has little bearing on democratically elected governments which the citizens can always change through democratic elections or an impeachment process that is available. There is no need for revolts or resistance as there is a democratic process to address any grievances. There is no ruthless and tyrannical king, there is only a democratically elected president, democratically elected congressmen and appointed Supreme Court judges. There are no dynasties. Vote for someone that you like and be happy. And if you don't like our system then move somewhere else.
So your argument is that we no longer need the 2A? Good. Go change it then. Until then, we have a right to keep and bear arms. Get used to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top