Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2014, 11:47 PM
 
663 posts, read 503,853 times
Reputation: 114

Advertisements

NATO should have been disbanded after the collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the end of the USSR in 1991. But, it had become not merely an alliance of states pledging to defend one another from attack, but an extensive organizational bureaucracy with many people dependent on its continued existence for their livelihoods. Once these bureaucracies become entrenched, they take on a life and mission of their own and prove very difficult to disband.

NATO Hasn’t Been a “Defensive Alliance” For a Long Time | The American Conservative

***

The comment that NATO represents a cover for unilateral action is very clever. That's what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2014, 05:03 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
2,737 posts, read 3,164,429 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wise TibetanMonkey View Post
I don't know, they don't seem to be as enthusiastic as we are. Even here in America there's a large chunk of the population that smells foul play. We took the first step provoking a coup, and then blamed Russia for the backlash. WE BROKE THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS HOWEVER CORRUPT IT WAS. They are fighting for survival and we don't. If they run and cut the losses, they'll more revolutions and coups to deal with. NATO have been encroaching around their vital space when NATO should have been dismantled along with the fall of the USSR, and the consequent threat from a powerful empire.

I hope we question our motives for the war. If anything we could get busy with Mexico that already has enough corruption. Would be support a coup in Mexico? What is America doing in Ukraine. We know it's not about democracy and freedom.
I don't recall the EU doing anything in respect of the overthrowing of the previous regime in Ukraine, as for being enthusiasm, you can hardly call the Obama regimes response to international events including Ukraine enthusiastic at the best of times.

In terms of the US/EU Sanctions they are now starting to hit Moscow and the Russians aren't so much full of pride and might now, they are whinging about how unfair it all is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC -29 April 2014

Russia has condemned new US and EU sanctions that have been imposed over Moscow's actions in Ukraine.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said "Iron Curtain"-style US sanctions could harm its hi-tech sector.

Moscow also said the EU should be ashamed of extending its sanctions and was "under Washington's thumb".

Russia repeated it had no intention of invading east Ukraine, where pro-Russia activists have seized buildings in more than a dozen towns.

BBC News - Ukraine crisis: Russia condemns US 'Iron Curtain' sanctions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 05:08 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
2,737 posts, read 3,164,429 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wise TibetanMonkey View Post
This is a thought-provoking idea that exposes how the West may have their own Ukraine.

SCOTLAND IS A MODEL FOR UKRAINE

Scotland wants independence from England, not because England is that terribly bad, but because Scotland is more enthusiastic about the European Union. The issue is 50/50 in England, but the polls say Scots support the EU 3 to 1. In other words, the EU is both unifying and dividing nations.

The question is, will England let Scotland go? I hope they don't interfere with that effort. That would be antidemocratic. The Ukraine should the same: divide those who believe those who believe in the EU, and those who don't, ie. those who want to go with Russia.
Scots equally split over EU membership

Scotland is having a vote on Independence later this year. There is a thread on the UK Sub-forum of City Data discussing the issue.

In different parts of the UK you are going to have different political support just like in different parts of the US, the North and South of England also being very different, and the most likely outcome is going to be more devolved powers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wise TibetanMonkey View Post
Well, unless the nuclear umbrella works 100%, it's going to be a mess. An all out campaign on Russia will be equally crazy. They started WWII weak but got stronger along the way. We haven't even being able to dislodge al-Assad.

They could turn Spartan, both in the sense of austere and militaristic. They may drop capitalism altogether and revert to communism. Or they could turn fascist in everything but name. The Western citizen is weak and lacks any particularly philosophy other than a commitment to profits. We are unwilling and unable to bring back the draft. To occupy Russia you need several million soldiers, if you must face an insurgency 100 times worse than Iraq.

At the same time this could launch many crazy leaders into action. Iran and North Korea are prime examples. If WWII was crazy, this is suicidal. This is not Iraq.

Relax, will ya...

Ukraine is being picked on precisely because it's weak and isolated.

Putin does not want to cross swords with NATO.

NATO has little direct interest in Ukraine.

This'll blow over just like the Russia vs Georgia fiasco did 6 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 08:08 AM
 
663 posts, read 503,853 times
Reputation: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I don't think the Ukraine sees much benefit in the NATO Alliance, they are not going to start world war 3 over this one, I hope.

Putin is basically crazy, he longs for the old days and the Russia that once was, not there anymore.
I've heard some crazy language about WWIII coming from the Ukrainian leadership. It's like they say, "Our independence is worth the risk of WWIII."

The eastern European countries that joined NATO are pretty antagonistic too. They have in fact paved the way for Russian paranoia by installing antimissile defenses. Ukraine sent some troops into our latest military adventures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 08:11 AM
 
663 posts, read 503,853 times
Reputation: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
Congratulate the former Ukrainians on their new Russian citizenship!!!!!!

No one is going to war over a small Boratcountry.
Hey, that's Acapulco for the Russians. They traditionally had their holidays there.

And it has strategic importance as well. The Russian fleet is there for a reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 08:29 AM
 
663 posts, read 503,853 times
Reputation: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bamford View Post
I don't recall the EU doing anything in respect of the overthrowing of the previous regime in Ukraine, as for being enthusiasm, you can hardly call the Obama regimes response to international events including Ukraine enthusiastic at the best of times.

In terms of the US/EU Sanctions they are now starting to hit Moscow and the Russians aren't so much full of pride and might now, they are whinging about how unfair it all is.
The evidence of European involvement in Ukraine's coup is evident. The word "coup" itself has been removed from the Western media. The bias couldn't be more noticeable when they refer to the Eastern rebels (terrorists!) being "planted" by Russia.

This is a good question:

Would the American people accept a band of outlaws taking over our public buildings at the barrel of a gun … because foreign nations were angry that the US Government failed to sign a trade agreement?


The Ukraine Deception: US/EU-Directed Coup D'état Exposes Itself
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 08:32 AM
 
663 posts, read 503,853 times
Reputation: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bamford View Post
Scots equally split over EU membership

Scotland is having a vote on Independence later this year. There is a thread on the UK Sub-forum of City Data discussing the issue.

In different parts of the UK you are going to have different political support just like in different parts of the US, the North and South of England also being very different, and the most likely outcome is going to be more devolved powers.
Yes, and this cultural divide dates back to the Roman conquest of England but not Scotland.

Scotland is the home of free people. I hope they choose independence, just to see London's reaction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
2,737 posts, read 3,164,429 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wise TibetanMonkey View Post
The evidence of European involvement in Ukraine's coup is evident. The word "coup" itself has been removed from the Western media. The bias couldn't be more noticeable when they refer to the Eastern rebels (terrorists!) being "planted" by Russia.

This is a good question:

Would the American people accept a band of outlaws taking over our public buildings at the barrel of a gun … because foreign nations were angry that the US Government failed to sign a trade agreement?


The Ukraine Deception: US/EU-Directed Coup D'état Exposes Itself
I suggest you find a credible source from a credible news source.

The protests that led to the downfall of the Ukrainian Government had nothing to do with the EU or US, and have you have already pointed out we are not that enthusiastic in terms of getting involved now beyond obvious sanctions.



Last edited by Bamford; 04-29-2014 at 09:05 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
2,737 posts, read 3,164,429 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wise TibetanMonkey View Post
Yes, and this cultural divide dates back to the Roman conquest of England but not Scotland.

Scotland is the home of free people. I hope they choose independence, just to see London's reaction.
There are differences in many countries, however Great Britain is a very small island which has been subject to mass immigration and mass worker mobility. Many people in England have Scottish, Welsh and Irish ancestry and vice versa. The lowland cities of Scotland have attracted a lot of workers from England, as have Aberdeen and the North.

England being home to more Scots than any where else and more first generation Irish and Welsh, and we pride ourselves on being a multicultural society.

As for the arguments in relation to any potential vote they can be found in the thread on the UK subsection of this website.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top