Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2014, 11:48 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
Why would you offer up a graph in percentages. If the deficit is really dropping then show it in $$$.

What we don't want to see is this trend continuing:



I don't care whose fault it is. Dems and Repubs both owe an explanation. Why did your most recent President double our National Debt? The thing we need is for the overall federal debt to shrink. The deficit only represents how much we're piling onto it.

Here's how we've been doing lately:



Congratulations Barry, you've finally borrowed less than $1 trillion in one year. But you're still growing the federal debt at an absolutely alarming rate!
A WHOLE LOT "less than $1 trillion in one year".

And to answer your question "why did your most recent President double out National Debt"?
Well first off - the only President on your graph who "doubled the nation debt" was Bush (and even he did't QUITE do that - but pretty close). Why don't you tell ME why he doubled it. And by the way, Bush AND Obama are not just "MY" president, they were/are "YOUR" president as well.
Secondly, the 2009 budget was BUSH'S last budget (budget years run from Oct to Sept), but aside from that, the REASON the DEFICIT grew so much from 2007 to 2010 is quite simple - a HUGE RECESSION. Roughly half the increase in the deficit was not due to higher spending at all, but rather due to a steep drop-off in tax revenues. Such increases in the deficit happen EVERY TIME there is a recession - this one was particularly steep and deep.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2014, 11:50 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,261,937 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kreutz View Post
450,500,600...the end result is the same isn't it?

A charred husk of a corpse.

The post makes sense if you understand how budgets work (you obviously don't).

Celebrating a reduction in the deficit ignores the fact it's still growing, yet just a little slower.

Or, as someone else said, "instead of gaining 20lbs a year we're only gaining 10lbs a year, look how thin we're getting".

You can't spend your way out of debt.
Yes, you can, if you're a government. When the economy is good, tax income rises. When you suck the money out of the economy with austerity, taxes fall. A 5-year-old would understand this.

Besides, I'm waiting for you to tell me how you get anything to go down without stopping the rate of its rise. Magic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2014, 11:53 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,704,652 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kreutz View Post
You can't spend your way out of debt.
You cannot have the nation throw enough poor people over the cliff to get out of financial debt either, without incurring a moral debt orders of magnitude greater. And you cannot have the nation shut down its national defense, without incurring massive risks that no reasonable person would suggest. And you cannot stop paying interest on existing debt to get out of debt, without making everything cost more for everyone. And so on... So what's your point? What specifically are you complaining about? If you want to cut specific things from the budget, then say what they are, and defend the removal of those things from the budget, on both financial and moral grounds. Just whining about how much everything costs, taken together, refusing to do the hard work of understanding what "everything" is and what all the different "everythings" mean to people other than yourself, isn't impressive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2014, 11:56 AM
 
2,776 posts, read 3,595,372 times
Reputation: 2312
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
Yes, you can, if you're a government. When the economy is good, tax income rises. When you suck the money out of the economy with austerity, taxes fall. A 5-year-old would understand this.
You're completely ignoring the very real effects of printing too much money to cover the spending.

Quote:
Besides, I'm waiting for you to tell me how you get anything to go down without stopping the rate of its rise. Magic?
Generally stopping the rate of the rise is the first step in getting something to go down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2014, 11:57 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
Interesting.
It depends on how the question is worded.

Is the deficit falling, yeah, if you only look at short term, (which you are)

but not only is the deficit falling expected to be short term, per the CBO, if you expand the period of time out even further than a short attention span most Democrats seem to be only capable of, you'll see that the deficits are still many many times higher than they were under Bush, the very ones liberals whined about and blamed for crashing the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2014, 11:59 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
You cannot have the nation throw enough poor people over the cliff to get out of financial debt either, without incurring a moral debt orders of magnitude greater. And you cannot have the nation shut down its national defense, without incurring massive risks that no reasonable person would suggest. And you cannot stop paying interest on existing debt to get out of debt, without making everything cost more for everyone. And so on... So what's your point? What specifically are you complaining about? If you want to cut specific things from the budget, then say what they are, and defend the removal of those things from the budget, on both financial and moral grounds. Just whining about how much everything costs, taken together, refusing to do the hard work of understanding what "everything" is and what all the different "everythings" mean to people other than yourself, isn't impressive.
Please cite for me one neighborhood which has stimulated itself out of a depressed area by increasing welfare spending.

Thank you...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2014, 12:00 PM
 
2,776 posts, read 3,595,372 times
Reputation: 2312
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
You cannot have the nation throw enough poor people over the cliff to get out of financial debt either, without incurring a moral debt orders of magnitude greater. And you cannot have the nation shut down its national defense, without incurring massive risks that no reasonable person would suggest. And you cannot stop paying interest on existing debt to get out of debt, without making everything cost more for everyone. And so on... So what's your point? What specifically are you complaining about? If you want to cut specific things from the budget, then say what they are, and defend the removal of those things from the budget, on both financial and moral grounds. Just whining about how much everything costs, taken together, refusing to do the hard work of understanding what "everything" is and what all the different "everythings" mean to people other than yourself, isn't impressive.
"Poor" people can fend for themselves as they should have always done, instead of having their entire existences paid for by everyone else.

2/3rd deficit? Done

The military-industrial complex shut down and downsized into a flexible small defensive force buoyed by our nuclear arsenal deterring any conventional land/sea/air invasion forces?

Remaining 1/3rd of deficit? Done.

Tax incomes used to pay down debt and our money is actually valuable again.

Problem solved and the only losers are the professional "poor" profiteers and defense contractors and the politicians they continually re-elect.

You're welcome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2014, 12:00 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,261,937 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kreutz View Post
You're completely ignoring the very real effects of printing too much money to cover the spending.



Generally stopping the rate of the rise is the first step in getting something to go down.
Um, yes. So you were mocking the idea of the debt increase slowing down because …. ?????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2014, 12:02 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Secondly, the 2009 budget was BUSH'S last budget (budget years run from Oct to Sept), but aside from that, the REASON the DEFICIT grew so much from 2007 to 2010 is quite simple - a HUGE RECESSION. Roughly half the increase in the deficit was not due to higher spending at all, but rather due to a steep drop-off in tax revenues. Such increases in the deficit happen EVERY TIME there is a recession - this one was particularly steep and deep.
Stimulus bill, porkulus bill and other big spending took place under Obama in year 1...

And dont forget, that "doubling" of the debt under Bush, also added TARP, which was paid back, and credited towards Obama, which he also spent...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2014, 12:04 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
Um, yes. So you were mocking the idea of the debt increase slowing down because …. ?????
The slow down, per the CBO is only temporary..

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top