Back to REAL news. New Benghazi emails mean Obama impeachment should be launched. Coordinated effort to cover for Obama (Congressmen, middle east)

[dman72]

Originally Posted by Retroit

And to think that Nixon resigned over a simple burglary.

A burgalary that his own people perpetrated.

Do you guys think that the attack in Benghazi was sanctioned by Obama himself? No, at worst his staff put political spin on a current event.

There certainly not a lot of nuance in a lot of you guys, that's for sure.

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by Retroit

And to think that Nixon resigned over a simple burglary.

Obama has lots of other things to attack him on, but Benghazi isnt his fault.

Lying about it is, but lying to the public isnt an impeachable offense...

[pantin23]

Why not beat an actual dead horse?

[Little-Acorn]

Originally Posted by dman72

Do you guys think that the attack in Benghazi was sanctioned by Obama himself?

Nope. But the long draw-down in security for months before the big attack, during which lots of smaller attacks took place but he ignored, was sanctioned by Obama himself, for the purpose of pretending Al Qaeda was "on the run" as he kept publicly insisting in the runup to the election.

And that long draw-down in security, led directly to the big attack against the consulate on Sept. 11, and the deaths of four Americans including the Ambassador.

[Longford]

Looking for blame? Then blame the U.S. Congress, the GOP contingent, for refusing State Department requests for more money to protect the Consulates and Embassies. Can't have it both ways, playing your blame game. Little sentiment is expressed for the lives lost. It's about the blame game. Let go of the hate, and focus on real and important security issues which the GOP and Tea Party fanatics refuse to deal with.

[LibertyandJusticeforAll]

When Americans die, I think its clear when you cover up why they died I ask the question? If you were killed by a drone, and they said you were a terrorist and emails showed to cover up that you weren't and they killed a innocent person. Is that a impeachable offensive? When you call a terrorists attack the result of a internet video then throw that person in JAIL or blaming them as the reason is that an impeachable offensive? When you have to take away someone's freedom to cover up the lie by jailing them over probation violations is just said. I ask does that person belong in office as president.

If the murders and lairs are running your country and Americans die protecting freedom and defending free speech even on a internet video what are we doing here?

That applies to ALL presidents and elected leaders.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Tilt11

“to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”

Since that is what they believed was true when the email was written, your complaint is... what exactly?

[pantin23]

I Swear, the republicans would be more calm if Obama and Clinton actually killed the ambassadors with their own hands.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by LibertyandJusticeforAll

When Americans die, I think its clear when you cover up why they died I ask the question?

I agree.

That did not happen here.

[kidkaos2]

Originally Posted by HeyJude514

Conservatives have no clue what constitutes an impeachable offense. Their silly fantasies about getting this president out of office just go on and on and on and on...

[YAWN]

So after literally years of people saying this is a phony scandal and not news, we now find proof that the White House covered up the deaths of American citizens and framed an innocent film maker for causing an attack.

And the liberal's reaction is to yawn.

Of course, when a lane on a bridge in New Jersey was closed for a couple of hours, we had outrage. But then the governor there was a Republican, so that changes everything.