Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,176,592 times
Reputation: 7875

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
Registration in Oregon allows you to register without proving citizenship. You're okay with that?

http://www.eac.gov/assets/1/Document...1-1-13_ENG.pdf
Here are the state specific instructions for Oregon from the Federal Voter Registration form. The relevant block where one would or would not show ID and prove citizenship is block 6. For Oregon, you can write NONE and thus not prove either citizenship, identity, or that you are registering to the state where you live.
Yet fraud has never been an issue in any election in Oregon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:16 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,404,740 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
So you were wrong. Is this your way of admitting that?
The 24th Amendment is very clear. Poll taxes are unconstitutional. End of discussion.

Any fee required to vote is a violation of the 24th Amendment. That includes paying for required documents to get a voter ID.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:16 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Ouch for Republicans hoping to suppress the vote. Good news for the people of Wisconsin.
Why even require people to register? Wouldnt that surpress the votes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:16 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Park View Post
The very same ruling was made in the courts here in Pennsylvania recently.
....and it's wide open for appeal and most likely will be appealed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,023,344 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
You do realize that these folks are already registered, right?!

Don't move the goalpost. The issue is photo ID, not citizenship. A 70+ year old black person from the deep South probably does not have the ability to retrieve their birth certificate.

Citizenship is proven with a social security card.
Yet they're not required to provide that to register either. Whenever the voter ID conversation comes up, I am obviously in favor of it. However, my issue is that it doesn't go far enough. We need to better protect our voting process and voter ID is only one piece of it. Why do you not value our process enough to offer these basic protections like almost every other country does?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:18 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,176,592 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
Baloney - she lived well past the "I was born in the 20's in a one room house with no lights
and no birth certificate, blah blah blah.

Do you make excuses about everything she does not want to do.
96 years is ample time to get identification in this country.

She did not live the last 30 years in America where she could not get an I.D.
and you don't have to drive to get a picture I.D. either.

And if she can't produce one in person, register to vote and get an absentee ballot
mailed to her home. Or what, she can't mail a letter either.
She lived a much of her life in a rural area until recent year. But regardless, there is no need for a photo ID to vote. Unless you want to make all voting done in person only and each polling office must have a photo on file of you to compare it to your photo ID before you are allowed to vote. Which seems like a costly waste of time for something that isn't even a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:19 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,968,512 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
The 24th Amendment is very clear. Poll taxes are unconstitutional. End of discussion.

Any fee required to vote is a violation of the 24th Amendment. That includes paying for required documents to get a voter ID.
Amen. The nation is past the tactics of 1964 Mississippi, Thank God.

The push for "documentation" is perfectly in sync with the tactics of Concerned Citizen Councils of decades past. it is NOT occuring in GOP hotbeds. Geez, I wonder why
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:20 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
The documents required to get the FREE ID are not free.
In PA that is not the case, what's you argument now? Matter of fact the state of PA bent over backwards ro make this work and it's still not good enough.


Quote:
A photo ID is not required for voting. It is 100% unconstitutional.
False:
Quote:
Crawford v. Marion County Election Board - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In a 6-3 decision in 2008, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the photo ID requirement, finding it closely related to Indiana's legitimate state interest in preventing voter fraud, modernizing elections, and safeguarding voter confidence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:20 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,404,740 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
Yet they're not required to provide that to register either. Whenever the voter ID conversation comes up, I am obviously in favor of it. However, my issue is that it doesn't go far enough. We need to better protect our voting process and voter ID is only one piece of it. Why do you not value our process enough to offer these basic protections like almost every other country does?
Because voting is a right, not a privilege. There is no process to be protected. You cannot discriminate against a citizen in elections, period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2014, 06:22 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post

Gun ID is valid though! Student IDs are also banned, despite student IDs requiring residency information.
False again at least as far as Pa goes, the PA law allows for student ID's, long term care ID's and many others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top