Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What is your opinion on smoking bans?
For smoking bans 114 66.28%
Against smoking bans 41 23.84%
No opinion either way 17 9.88%
Voters: 172. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:16 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,719 posts, read 18,788,778 times
Reputation: 22571

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
Uh...no. Unless you're standing right over the chainsaw, the sound shouldn't be loud enough to damage your hearing at all. But no amount of cigarette smoke is healthy.
And you see no problem with it if it's not a physically damaging sound coming from the neighbor? So If I ran a sawmill next to your home, given that the sound level intensity was not, scientifically-speaking, damaging to your hearing, you'd be fine with it?

Again, I'd take a whiff of smoke on the odd afternoon when the wind was just right over all sorts of annoying noises coming from neighbors. Believe me, I know. I'm living it right now. I wish to god the guy next door spent as much time smoking as he did terrorizing his neighbors with loud-ass machinery, dogs, stereo systems, ridiculous diesel trucks, and profanity. If I see he's smoking in his yard, I look up and say thanks because I know he won't be assaulting my ears for a few minutes. His smoking is healthy for me and my sanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:16 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,310,667 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman
Yes, I do believe that it's okay for government by and for the people to make laws based on what the majority want. Zoning laws are a good example and laws based loosely on the 10 Commandments. In order to living in a civilized society we have to agree on a certain level of governing. The struggle on how much or how little we govern is a healthy zin/yang, positive/negativity, light/darkness struggle that is as old as time itself. It will always be that way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Im sorry you feel that mob rule creates civilized societies. Government schools love to teach such nonsense, it makes for good tools...er uh citizens.
If you wish to ban smoking within someone elses property, what else? The consumption of liquor, a limit on sodas, serving sizes?
Where in the ten commandments does it say thou shalt by proxy (government) govern thy neighbors home?
Go back and re-read my reply. I didn't say the Ten Commandments gives governments the right to govern our neighbors. I said that laws loosely based on the Ten Commandments---thou shall not murder, thou shall not steal---are examples things most people in civilized society agree upon and are willing to abide by for the greater good of mankind. You think all government is bad, I do not. We ban smoking in our state because the majority of people here want it that way and rather than hurt businesses, it's helped them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:22 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,203,740 times
Reputation: 35012
We would never allow smoking in restaurants anywhere if it were something new. EVERYONE knows this, it's just perceived as a "take away" of rights since we didn't really know any better in the past. Admitting that is tough.

Like many things, it should be an activity you do when nobody else is around to be bothered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:22 PM
 
3,304 posts, read 2,172,053 times
Reputation: 2390
I think smoking bans should be the choice of individual businesses. In my city, smoking is banned even in bars. The business should make this call. If a restaurant wants smoking in their establishment, then so be it. Customers should make the choice on whether or not they want to give their business to that place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:26 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,719 posts, read 18,788,778 times
Reputation: 22571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
We ban smoking in our state because the majority of people here want it that way and rather than hurt businesses, it's helped them.
I'd agree that it has helped some or maybe even most businesses. But not all. Being a musician, I used to play my music in the many, many nightclubs around here. In fact, for a quite a long time, that's all I did to make money--six nights a week much of the time. Well, since the smoking ban, almost every nightclub has closed in the area. There are a handful in the entire county now. So it didn't help everyone.


For the record, no, I don't smoke. But I can see both sides of the issue because I try to take it in context beyond my personal opinion. Now, if we were talking about my personal opinion, I think smoking really stinks and is really annoying... yet, I'll argue for the right to smoke all day long. As long as the smoker is not blowing smoke in my face directly, my opinion should not dictate his/her smoking or other lifestyle issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Top of the South, NZ
22,216 posts, read 21,667,670 times
Reputation: 7608
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
I'd agree that it has helped some or maybe even most businesses. But not all. Being a musician, I used to play my music in the many, many nightclubs around here. In fact, for a quite a long time, that's all I did to make money--six nights a week much of the time. Well, since the smoking ban, almost every nightclub has closed in the area. There are a handful in the entire county now. So it didn't help everyone.


For the record, no, I don't smoke. But I can see both sides of the issue because I try to take it in context beyond my personal opinion. Now, if we were talking about my personal opinion, I think smoking really stinks and is really annoying... yet, I'll argue for the right to smoke all day long. As long as the smoker is not blowing smoke in my face directly, my opinion should not dictate his/her smoking or other lifestyle issues.
I would also argue for the right for people to smoke,... just not in a restaurant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:36 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
OTHER: Let the restaurant owners decide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,461,965 times
Reputation: 8599
I don't miss the 'good old days' when the stank of cigarettes permeated every restaurant. Municipal smoking bans are as legitimate as municipal health inspections and zoning laws. It's not up to the restaurant owner to decide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:45 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,098,699 times
Reputation: 4828
The Liberty concerns of Laissez-Faire Capitalism are supreme to any protections of the public health and welfare. There should be no regulation of restaurants whatsoever. Smoking bans, health codes, inspections, etc., are nothing but shackles enslaving us all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2014, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Humboldt County, CA
778 posts, read 823,449 times
Reputation: 1493
I have asthma and moderate to severe allergies, both of which are bothered by cigarette smoke.

CA enacted a smoking ban in restaurants when I was a kid, but prior to that my parents had to be careful about where they took me. I remember coming home itchy-eyed and wheezing quite often.

So, naturally, I'm all for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top