Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Whatever. Happily, a few minutes looking revealed something relevant to those tooting Judith Curry's horn as well as to that guy who was saying all the models are wrong in another one of these denialist threads.
I've said so explicitly. Several times. I'll say it again. I am not trying to change denialists' opinions, I'm just showing their claims are not supported by the facts. I expect denialists to continue to lie despite the facts. I'm not interested in debating people who whine and cry about Al Gore when presented with facts that contradict Rush and Sean. As the saying goes, it tires me out and annoys the pig.
You seem to have constructed this strawman argument that anyone who disagrees with your opinions about AGW gets their information from Sean or Rush and can't think for themselves. You constantly whine about partisan right-wingers yet you are one of the most partisan left wingers there is.
You seem to have constructed this strawman argument that anyone who disagrees with your opinions about AGW gets their information from Sean or Rush and can't think for themselves.
Yeah. The whining about Al Gore and liberals is a dead giveaway.
Quote:
You constantly whine about partisan right-wingers yet you are one of the most partisan left wingers there is.
To the right, science is the purview of the left. To everyone else, it's just science. It's the denialists who feel the need to make this about sides. I love the way you guys refer to scientists as "your scientists".
Yeah. The whining about Al Gore and liberals is a dead giveaway.
To the right, science is the purview of the left. To everyone else, it's just science. It's the denialists who feel the need to make this about sides. I love the way you guys refer to scientists as "your scientists".
Who is whining about Al Gore and liberals? The OP was about Judith Curry who simply advocated for more openness and transparency in science. For that, you dismissed her as not worth listening to. The only blind partisan in evidence consistently here is you.
The skeptics need to make it about sides? You are the one who brings up Rush and Sean in almost every post and accuse others of being right wingers. Without your "rightwing bogeyman" as a strawman to rail against, you'd have nothing to talk about.
No, I didn't dismiss her for that. I showed why she should be dismissed.
I'm biased towards science over blogs in right-wing business magazines. If you don't like it, sue me or something. I'm not going to pretend lies are true to spare your feelings because I don't care about your feelings.
No, I didn't dismiss her for that. I showed why she should be dismissed.
I'm biased towards science over blogs in right-wing business magazines. If you don't like it, sue me or something. I'm not going to pretend lies are true to spare your feelings because I don't care about your feelings.
Sure, keep flailing away at those rightwing straw men and bragging about how well you think you are doing. Your posts are a running source of amusement at this point.
Why Richard Tol pulled out as one of the main authors.
Face it, your argument is slowly collapsing into itself in a most painful way.
Tol simply objected to the tone of the report... he didn't say AGW wasn't a catastrophe, just that we would be able to survive it and what's more is he argues in favor of reducing carbon pollution.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.