Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If one politician calling one Black guy a de facto slave is offensive, what does that make two politicians calling 95% of voting Blacks de facto slaves?
But back on topic, if what's been presented is actually true, then that group has no business getting gov't funding. For some reason, I highly doubt that this is the full story.
It's complete BS. You might see these things because you WANT to see them and you most likely attribute inane harmless things to the way you want to see them.
If one politician calling one Black guy a de facto slave is offensive, what does that make two politicians calling 95% of voting Blacks de facto slaves?
I would call them correct. Remember blacks are allowed to be racists, even to their own people.
Perhaps the money would be better invested in writing a list of things that white people CAN do in the presence of black people.
^^^this^^…After reading the list , I had a bit of a revaluation, as well. These are all traits exhibited by simpering, patronizing, liberal , white apologists. The historical revisionists and pandering leftist college types. The lines are still drawn , very much , on color. These types just want to be on both sides of the line, equally, and they don't get it.
It's the Daily Caller. Somehow, this isn't the whole story.
They get stuff wrong, and rarely if ever issue a retraction.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.