Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2014, 08:22 AM
 
24,834 posts, read 37,269,983 times
Reputation: 11538

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
Weather doesn't affect the economy?

If half the country is paralyzed and trapped at home, they aren't buying things.
In fact they are.

They eat.....rent movies....keep their home warmer.....buy blankets...space heaters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2014, 08:39 AM
 
14,293 posts, read 9,656,369 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
The new GDP forecast for the year is a measly 1 percent. And that's assuming there is no additional downturn.

While a harsh winter is to blame for some of it, the underlying foundation of our economy is still very weak. A harsh winter should never cause GDP to go negative.
I'm sure Obama has some new job killing EPA regulations coming out this year that will further stifle the economy, and his other policies will weaken the US dollar even more, so yeah, it will downturn, and our the cost of living will increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,523 posts, read 2,198,570 times
Reputation: 698
Yeah we should try more trickle down economics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,623 posts, read 19,099,471 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
The revised GDP estimate for the first quarter is out and it ain't pretty. The contraction was more than expected (1% vs. 0.6%). Corporate profits were also down.

U.S. GDP Contracted at 1% Pace in First Quarter - WSJ.com
More than expected?

You know, this "...._______ unexpected..." [insert adverb] nonsense is getting freaking old.

When Americans bought into Obamacare, they bought the recession that comes with it.

I'm mad as hell now.

I should have stuck with the the math. Over a year ago I was predicting a recession 2nd Quarter 2014, because that's what the numbers showed. When Obama started playing dictator and delaying the implementation of key parts of Obamacare, I thought it would have an impact.

I never thought it would stop the recession....that's impossible....but you can delay a recession for a quarter or two. Maybe even a year, under the right conditions and if you do all the right things at all the right times.

Anyway, this is Obama's Recession....he owns it....can't blame Bush for this (but they will).

Corporate profits aren't really relevant. You need to be looking at non-corporate profits, since contrary to Liberal fantasies 97% of all companies in the US are not corporations....they are the meat.....corporations are the gravy.

That data comes from IRS tax data, except they're 2 years behind (just now publishing 2012 data), so you use that, and then interpolate using FICA and HI tax data.

Corporate profits (or lack of) do not always correlate with non-corporate profits, although they often do.

Historically, the stock market always sets records during bad economic times, so guess how bad your economy really is?

Obamacare is sucking the life out of your economy. Maybe this will be a good thing...causing people to start seriously examining Free Market reforms in healthcare that will force a decrease in the cost of medical care, which will in turn force a decrease in the cost of health plan coverage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
The new GDP forecast for the year is a measely 1 percent. And that's assuming there is no additional downturn.

While a harsh winter is to blame for some of it, the underlying foundation of our economy is still very weak. A harsh winter should never cause GDP to go negative.
Weather is never a factor.

I've been asking for 4 years how much one employee will cost under Obamacare come January 1, 2014.

None of the ACA supporters could answer the question, and in fact refused to even attempt to answer.

And so, here we all are -- it's May 2014 -- and we still have no clue how much one employee will cost under Obamacare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
LOL..and don't forget they changed the way GDP is calculated which gave it an automatic BUMP of 3%.
The values of paintings hanging in the WH now contribute to the GDP.

Shadowstats still calculates GDP pre last July when they changed it..-2% folks.
You've been negative for 2 consecutive quarters....4th Quarter 2013 and 1st Quarter 2014.

Maybe they can change the way they calculate GDP again.....this time count CO2 as a resource.

Expecting...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,305,478 times
Reputation: 27718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
You've been negative for 2 consecutive quarters....4th Quarter 2013 and 1st Quarter 2014.

Maybe they can change the way they calculate GDP again.....this time count CO2 as a resource.

Expecting...

Mircea
They knew another recession was coming and changed the numbers because we all know that "officially" two consecutive quarters of negativity means.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 09:06 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,078,071 times
Reputation: 9408
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Everyone likes to blame the weather.

In the summer it's "too hot" and in the winter it's "snow" or "too cold".
And we totally disregard that most shopping and consuming is happening ONLINE now.

The "harsh weather" in reality affects delivery companies and supermarkets directly.

Online shopping surpassed brick and mortar back in 2012.
I totally agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,523 posts, read 2,198,570 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
More than expected?

You know, this "...._______ unexpected..." [insert adverb] nonsense is getting freaking old.

When Americans bought into Obamacare, they bought the recession that comes with it.

I'm mad as hell now.

I should have stuck with the the math. Over a year ago I was predicting a recession 2nd Quarter 2014, because that's what the numbers showed. When Obama started playing dictator and delaying the implementation of key parts of Obamacare, I thought it would have an impact.

I never thought it would stop the recession....that's impossible....but you can delay a recession for a quarter or two. Maybe even a year, under the right conditions and if you do all the right things at all the right times.

Anyway, this is Obama's Recession....he owns it....can't blame Bush for this (but they will).

Corporate profits aren't really relevant. You need to be looking at non-corporate profits, since contrary to Liberal fantasies 97% of all companies in the US are not corporations....they are the meat.....corporations are the gravy.

That data comes from IRS tax data, except they're 2 years behind (just now publishing 2012 data), so you use that, and then interpolate using FICA and HI tax data.

Corporate profits (or lack of) do not always correlate with non-corporate profits, although they often do.

Historically, the stock market always sets records during bad economic times, so guess how bad your economy really is?

Obamacare is sucking the life out of your economy. Maybe this will be a good thing...causing people to start seriously examining Free Market reforms in healthcare that will force a decrease in the cost of medical care, which will in turn force a decrease in the cost of health plan coverage.





Mircea
Please tell me how Obamacare has been cause stagnant wages since the 70s which is destroying the american middle class. Whom has to take out debt to keep up consumerism which is 70% of the U.S. economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,305,478 times
Reputation: 27718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michigantown View Post
Please tell me how Obamacare has been cause stagnant wages since the 70s which is destroying the american middle class. Whom has to take out debt to keep up consumerism which is 70% of the U.S. economy.
Well we're only talking about the GDP here.
Obamacare costs to employers affect the current economy.
And soon we'll have another employer cost...mandatory retirement accounts set up (Secure Choice) or face stiff penalties.
2 states passed it already and 12 more have it in their queues.

Wage stagnation is another topic so why not start a thread on that ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,523 posts, read 2,198,570 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Well we're only talking about the GDP here.
Obamacare costs to employers affect the current economy.

Wage stagnation is another topic so why not start a thread on that ?
No it is the same topic. Wage stagnation effects GDP grow in a service economy. Not some garbage healthcare law. In the last couple decades The U.S. was able to keep GDP growth up with debt but you can't do that forever.

Last edited by Michigantown; 05-29-2014 at 09:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,305,478 times
Reputation: 27718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michigantown View Post
No it is the same topic. Wage stagnation effects GDP grow in a service economy. Not some garbage healthcare law. In the last couple decades The U.S. was able to keep GDP growth up with debt but ou can't do that forever.
Right so we changed the way we calculate GDP and now take the value of paintings hanging in the WH and add that to the GDP thus bumping us up a FREE 3%. We also count future pensions not paid and film royalties contributing to the GDP.

When the numbers get bad, find a new way to calculate "good numbers".

The USG has done that with inflation, unemployment, poverty, and now the GDP.
No other country on earth calculates the GDP the way we do since the July change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top