Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-04-2014, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,333,016 times
Reputation: 5480

Advertisements

While the United States takes an aggressive stand against fossil fuels, its neighbours to the south and north are working together to boost oil and gas production.

A high-level delegation from Mexico was in Calgary Monday to invite Canadian companies to take advantage of its sweeping energy reforms.

Endowed with massive oil and gas resources, the two countries have made their development central to their economies, while taking the view that growth and environmental protection can move hand-in-hand, not at each other’s expense.

“Mexico is fully committed to the transformation of the energy sector,” Leonardo Beltran Rodrigues, undersecretary of planning and energy transition at Mexico’s secretariat for energy and natural resources, told Canadian oil patch representatives. “We can do it with many people, but we would rather do it with friends.”

Mexico has long talked about changing its constitution to allow private sector investment in energy. President Enrique Pena Nieto made that happen last December, when Mexico’s congress passed a bill that ended the monopolies of PEMEX and of the Comision Federal de Electricidad over the hydrocarbon and electricity sectors.

Under the changes, Canadian companies can participate in the upstream end of the industry through service, profit-sharing, production-sharing contracts and licences. The midstream and downstream ends of the oil and gas industry, and the power sectors, are fully accessible by investors

In addition to inviting investment, the Mexicans are also looking for guidance from Canada on regulations, best practices and skills development.

For Canadian companies, the reforms are both a blessing and a curse. Canadian oil sands developers have benefitted greatly from Mexico’s production declines and taken over their share of the U.S. market

Mexico offers portfolio diversification for Canadian producers that are running into cost increases and pipeline challenges in Canada and the United States, Mr. Beltran Rodrigues said.

Besides, by investing in Mexico’s energy sector, Canadian companies are improving the country’s competitiveness, which helps other Canadian companies doing business there, from Bombardier Inc. to Palliser Furniture Upholstery Ltd., said Mr. Dade. “This is one case where investing abroad actually benefits us in Canada,” he said.

source: Canada, Mexico move to align energy development as U.S. gets tough on fossil fuels | Financial Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2014, 01:10 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,123,991 times
Reputation: 2037
K. Meanwhile in the US we are near record oil and gas production.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2014, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,333,016 times
Reputation: 5480
Wow one thing that stands out is Canada and Mexico are open to working together to expand our energy sectors and we both benefit from it since we both can avoid dealing with the EPA ever increasing demands and policies that are not attainable but actually hurt the energy and sector in all 3 countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2014, 01:25 PM
 
741 posts, read 764,614 times
Reputation: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
Wow one thing that stands out is Canada and Mexico are open to working together to expand our energy sectors and we both benefit from it since we both can avoid dealing with the EPA ever increasing demands and policies that are not attainable but actually hurt the energy and sector in all 3 countries.
Canada has oil to pump sell, and doesn't really care what the negative impacts of the transportation of that resource are. Mexico, well ... it's oil reserves are dwindling and it can't refine what it pumps from undersea. It's a bit too costly to buy petroleum from Canada unless, of course, the Keystone pipeline is built. The USA, meanwhile, is greatly expanding fossil fuel exploitation ... so any suggestion to the contrary is spoken from a lack of knowledge of the USA. Incresed use of renewable energy resources is the smart way to go, to blend with what's produced by burning fossil fuels ... but Canadians probably will never understand that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2014, 03:43 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,123,991 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
Wow one thing that stands out is Canada and Mexico are open to working together to expand our energy sectors and we both benefit from it since we both can avoid dealing with the EPA ever increasing demands and policies that are not attainable but actually hurt the energy and sector in all 3 countries.
What are you talking about? North America/Mexico is poised to be a major energy producer.... Care to specifically back up your opinion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2014, 03:56 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,237,091 times
Reputation: 12102
I seriously hope Keystone never happens as I stand to gain financially from driving trains full of Canadian sand oil. Selling my current plane for a turbine powered one is a goal thats achievable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2014, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,875 posts, read 26,532,311 times
Reputation: 25777
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
Wow one thing that stands out is Canada and Mexico are open to working together to expand our energy sectors and we both benefit from it since we both can avoid dealing with the EPA ever increasing demands and policies that are not attainable but actually hurt the energy and sector in all 3 countries.
That's the fact, Jack. Imagine if the US were only bright enough to develop the resources that are on public lands. We could actually get things like, oh, royalties from the producers. Create new jobs. Avoid sponsoring terrorism by not sending as much money to countries that harbor terrorists. Boost our economy and our immediate neighbors.

But no, we aren't that bright. Instead we'd rather drive that to other countries and further our dependency, both on other countries for fuel, as well as among the unemployed. But hey, it keeps a few of the most ignorant of the "environmental" community happy. Never mind that we drive production to countries with far lower environmental standards, NIMBY is addressed.

We are fortunate that producers on private lands are able to reduce the impact of the foolishness of our largest property owner. Reason 186,283 why federal lands should be turned over to the states to manage. They are much more responsible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2014, 06:21 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,502,847 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longford View Post
Canada has oil to pump sell, and doesn't really care what the negative impacts of the transportation of that resource are. Mexico, well ... it's oil reserves are dwindling and it can't refine what it pumps from undersea. It's a bit too costly to buy petroleum from Canada unless, of course, the Keystone pipeline is built. The USA, meanwhile, is greatly expanding fossil fuel exploitation ... so any suggestion to the contrary is spoken from a lack of knowledge of the USA. Incresed use of renewable energy resources is the smart way to go, to blend with what's produced by burning fossil fuels ... but Canadians probably will never understand that.
I think we understand it at least as well as you do.

Wind power in Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

U.S. and Canada's coal regulations side by side: Who wins? - Macleans.ca

Coal power in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top