Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2014, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Chicago
3,391 posts, read 4,483,007 times
Reputation: 7857

Advertisements

Nonsense.

Both Democrats and Republicans represent the same constituency: corporate America. That is why most corporations hedge their bets and give money to both parties.

However, Democrats and Republicans do have different voting bases, which should not be confused with their actual constituency. Their constituency actually has a say in what goes on; their voting bases simply vote for one party or the other to make the whole thing appear legitimate. It is faux democracy at its finest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2014, 08:16 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,207,220 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Then it's not a talking point anymore, it's a meme. Like the meme on how Republicans aren't the real racists, Democrats are



Jms96 and urbanlife took the words right out of my mouth.
So in other words, no? You have no intelligent comment on the subject? Got it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 08:17 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,528,561 times
Reputation: 2052
14 of 20. 36 of 39. Pretty damn arbitrary, doncha think? Come back when you have something solid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 08:20 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,528,561 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
New York 12 - makes $14,000 more than New York 10 (#3 on the list). You telling me New York 10 is lower middle class?

Next door (west) in district 13 is Rangel, who represents a poor constituency making $18,000+.

Next door (north) in district 15 is Serrano, who represents people making $11,000+.

Democrats cater to people who depend on money - either the poor, who need monetary help - or the rich, many of who use the government to enrich themselves further.
People who depend on money? Thanks. I did a spittake on that one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Should we move that district to the poorest group?
I don't know. It's your thread.

$57,147 in Malibu is $9,998 in Cleveland.

Several years back I was making $30,000 in Cleveland. Silly me, I could have been making $171,000 in Malibu while partaking in cocktails at Cher's mansion overlooking the Pacific.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 08:33 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,196,139 times
Reputation: 23897
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
I don't know. It's your thread.

$57,147 in Malibu is $9,998 in Cleveland.

Several years back I was making $30,000 in Cleveland. Silly me, I could have been making $171,000 in Malibu while partaking in cocktails at Cher's mansion overlooking the Pacific.
I'm just asking the question to these posts that says making so much in one place equals so much in another.

I assume we are talking average income (as opposed to mean, medium, etc).

New York, for example - they have the highest averages and the lowest averages in the same locality. Does this mean the extremely rich bring up the averages that much - whereas the majority of those populations are really poor?

I thought it was an interesting look at the incomes and who represents them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 08:43 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,528,561 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I'm just asking the question to these posts that says making so much in one place equals so much in another.

I assume we are talking average income (as opposed to mean, medium, etc).

New York, for example - they have the highest averages and the lowest averages in the same locality. Does this mean the extremely rich bring up the averages that much - whereas the majority of those populations are really poor?

I thought it was an interesting look at the incomes and who represents them.
Interesting? Maybe. Accurate? Not so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 09:08 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,740,361 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
That is very true, $75K wouldn't get you much in Manhattan.
But the government thinks you have enough. They see someone making $75k as a piggy bank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 09:18 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I'm just asking the question to these posts that says making so much in one place equals so much in another.

I assume we are talking average income (as opposed to mean, medium, etc).

New York, for example - they have the highest averages and the lowest averages in the same locality. Does this mean the extremely rich bring up the averages that much - whereas the majority of those populations are really poor?

I thought it was an interesting look at the incomes and who represents them.
I'm not sure about the methodology. I'm also not a D or R.

I don't know all the areas the encompass District 33 in California. Malibu, Beverly Hills, Calabasas, Brentwood, and Bel Air do.

Per capita income includes everyone in that specific area. For instance...

Malibu: $74,336 Cleveland: $17,317

So I was making $30K when the PCI in the city of Cleveland was probably around $15K (cuz it was a few years back). And yes I did live in the city limits. That's double...obviously...so it would put me at $150,000 in Malibu.

I lived pretty well in Cleveland too. Average single guy.

The reason why I'm comparing these two places is that you have two polar opposite cities. Obviously Cleveland has hordes of useless punks/wastes/gangsters. Malibu? Not so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 09:43 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
But the government thinks you have enough. They see someone making $75k as a piggy bank.
Thanks for this pointless anti-tax post but what does it have to do with the OP?.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top