Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
YOu could I suppose but hopelessly incorrect. The USSC has made it clear that there is no such role. Self defense with limits is what the court has said.
It is, I Agree, not what the founders intended. But it appears that all significant contingents have now agreed that the founders intent is no long operative.
The gunnies and their antagonists have a significant problem with the term "assault rifle"
Basically the antis believe that there is some fearsome thing called an assault rifle that is threatening their lifes and those of their kids.
The gunnies point out the antis simplly don't know what they are talking about and that these weapons are not really assault rifles.
So to avoid the resulting communication blockage a new term...HKR - Human Killing Rifles.
This is that set of firearms that have little legitimate purpose other than killing people.
Now we can talk about how to deal with such weapons without offending the gunnies by misuse of assault rifles while specifying the weapons that the antis believe have no useful purpose other than killing people.
I see.
Let's call them something they aren't.
That'll bring "clarity".
(Every time I think these leftist fanatics can't possibly get any more futile, they go ahead and do it.)
The gunnies and their antagonists have a significant problem with the term "assault rifle"
Basically the antis believe that there is some fearsome thing called an assault rifle that is threatening their lifes and those of their kids.
The gunnies point out the antis simplly don't know what they are talking about and that these weapons are not really assault rifles.
So to avoid the resulting communication blockage a new term...HKR - Human Killing Rifles.
This is that set of firearms that have little legitimate purpose other than killing people.
Now we can talk about how to deal with such weapons without offending the gunnies by misuse of assault rifles while specifying the weapons that the antis believe have no useful purpose other than killing people.
Soooooo, should the car driven by Ted Kennedy that killed that young woman (MJK) be called a HKC - human killing car?
HKH - human killing hammer. HKF - human killing fist. All three kill more people than rifles, according to the F.B.I.
Soooooo, should the car driven by Ted Kennedy that killed that young woman (MJK) be called a HKC - human killing car?
HKH - human killing hammer. HKF - human killing fist. All three kill more people than rifles, according to the F.B.I.
Cars, hammers and fists are not designed to kill humans. Not even all guns are designed to kill people.
But the attempt is to note there is a class of rifles whose primary purpose is to kill humans. HKR is merely an attempt to define this class. There are of course other weapons designed to kill people - the M1911.45 comes immediately to mind.
All of this is merely an attempt to stop the silly nonsense about "assault rifles". One would think the gunnies would like to get rid of that issue but apparently not....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
